We have located links that may give you full text access.
Three-Dimensional Fast Spin Echo Pituitary MRI in Treatment-Naïve Cushing's Disease: Reduced Impact of Reader Experience and Increased Diagnostic Accuracy.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI 2023 September 2
BACKGROUND: In patients with Cushing's disease, the preoperative identification of pituitary adenomas is crucial to treatment. However, increasing diagnostic accuracy remains an unresolved issue.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the impact of readers' experience regarding high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (hrMRI) for identifying pituitary adenomas in comparison with conventional contrast-enhanced MRI (cMRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (dMRI).
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
POPULATION: Sixty-five patients (median age, 39 years; interquartile range [IQR], 28-53 years; 60% females) with treatment-naïve Cushing's disease.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, seven fast spin echo sequences.
ASSESSMENT: The diagnostic accuracies of identifying pituitary adenomas on cMRI, dMRI, combined cMRI and dMRI (cdMRI), and hrMRI were independently evaluated by six readers with three experience levels (high: >20 years, modest: 10-20 years, low: <10 years; two readers for each experience level). Readers were asked to localize the lesion, and measure its diameter on the sequence where identified. The reference standard was postoperative histopathology. The impact of readers' experience and interobserver agreement were assessed. Image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, including overall image quality, sharpness, and structural conspicuity.
STATISTICAL TESTS: McNemar's test, Cochran's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and κ statistics for interobserver agreement. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: For identifying pituitary adenomas (median diameter, 5 mm; IQR, 4-5 mm), hrMRI had significantly higher sensitivity (87.7%-93.8%) than cMRI, dMRI, and cdMRI (52.3%-75.4%) for readers with different experience levels. The interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.461-0.523). The sensitivity for hrMRI was comparable between readers with different experience levels (P = 0.371). All image quality scores on hrMRI were significantly higher than cMRI and dMRI (5.0 vs. 4.0).
DATA CONCLUSION: For identifying pituitary adenomas in patients with treatment-naïve Cushing's disease, hrMRI may show high diagnostic accuracy and seems not to be affected by readers' experience.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the impact of readers' experience regarding high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (hrMRI) for identifying pituitary adenomas in comparison with conventional contrast-enhanced MRI (cMRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (dMRI).
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
POPULATION: Sixty-five patients (median age, 39 years; interquartile range [IQR], 28-53 years; 60% females) with treatment-naïve Cushing's disease.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, seven fast spin echo sequences.
ASSESSMENT: The diagnostic accuracies of identifying pituitary adenomas on cMRI, dMRI, combined cMRI and dMRI (cdMRI), and hrMRI were independently evaluated by six readers with three experience levels (high: >20 years, modest: 10-20 years, low: <10 years; two readers for each experience level). Readers were asked to localize the lesion, and measure its diameter on the sequence where identified. The reference standard was postoperative histopathology. The impact of readers' experience and interobserver agreement were assessed. Image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, including overall image quality, sharpness, and structural conspicuity.
STATISTICAL TESTS: McNemar's test, Cochran's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and κ statistics for interobserver agreement. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: For identifying pituitary adenomas (median diameter, 5 mm; IQR, 4-5 mm), hrMRI had significantly higher sensitivity (87.7%-93.8%) than cMRI, dMRI, and cdMRI (52.3%-75.4%) for readers with different experience levels. The interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.461-0.523). The sensitivity for hrMRI was comparable between readers with different experience levels (P = 0.371). All image quality scores on hrMRI were significantly higher than cMRI and dMRI (5.0 vs. 4.0).
DATA CONCLUSION: For identifying pituitary adenomas in patients with treatment-naïve Cushing's disease, hrMRI may show high diagnostic accuracy and seems not to be affected by readers' experience.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app