Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative Toxicology of Syringe Exchange and Post-Mortem Blood Samples in the District of Columbia: Trends and Affinity Analysis.

This cross-sectional analysis aimed to understand the similarities and differences between drugs detected in syringes collected from syringe service providers in the District of Columbia and fatal overdose deaths captured by the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System. Substance exposures for these fatal and non-fatal drug use outcomes have not been previously compared. Substance distributions were examined and a paired significance test was used to compare changes over time. Affinity analysis was employed to reveal substance co-occurrences. Between September, 2020-2022, 1,118 post-mortem blood samples and 3,646 syringes were processed, with fatal overdoses increasing 24.1%. Polysubstance use was more commonly found in post-mortem blood (82.5%) than syringe exchange samples (48.6%). Of samples containing opioids, 94.8% of blood samples and 86.3% of syringes contained fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, or fentanyl precursors/metabolites. Post-mortem blood samples had double the frequency of co-occurring stimulants and opioids (43.9%) as syringe exchange samples (21.8%). Major changes in occurrence frequency over time were found for opioid and stimulant exposure in both groups, especially in the increased occurrence of fluorofentanyl (>400%), methamphetamine (>90%), and xylazine (>60%) while the incidence of fentanyl, heroin, and metabolite morphine declined. These results indicate that while fatal use and syringe exchange populations have distinct substance exposures which may contribute to differences in mortality rate, their substance distributions have similar change magnitudes. This study highlights the utility of using multiple data sources to provide a comprehensive description of drug use patterns and discusses the limitations in reporting data from each source.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app