Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Biosimilar versus InnovAtor MoLecule of RAnibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related MaCular DEgeneration (The BALANCE Trial): Real-World Evidence.

PURPOSE: To analyse outcomes of innovator ranibizumab (IRM) (Lucentis) and biosimilar ranibizumab (BRM) (Razumab) in Indian eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS: Retrospective observational study in nAMD patients, who were treated with IRM or BRM (3 loading doses followed by pro re nata (PRN). Primary outcome measures were change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) along with safety analysis. Secondary outcomes measures were changes in the subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF).

RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were satisfied in 164 eyes (60.74%). A total of 87 eyes were treated with IRM, and 77 eyes received BRM. Baseline BCVA was 0.57±0.27 logMAR in IRM group and 0.61±0.25 in the BRM group. At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months BCVA was 0.27±0.22 ( p <0.0001), 0.34±0.23 ( p <0.0001), 0.39±0.25 ( p <0.0001), and 12 months 0.41±0.23 ( p <0.0001) in the IRM group and 0.24±0.16 ( p <0.0001), 0.27±0.16 ( p <0.0001), 0.34±0.17 ( p <0.0001), 0.38±0.18 ( p <0.0001) in the BRM group. Baseline CMT was 420.39±54.45 μm in IRM group and 407.82±53.07 μm in BRM group. At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, CMT decreased to 258.28±20.4 μm ( p <0.0001), 268.38±19.5 μm ( p <0.0001), 269.51±32.41 μm ( p <0.0001), and 278.28±16.56 μm ( p <0.0001) in the IRM group and 258.84±17.47 μm ( p <0.0001), 265.69±17.29 μm ( p <0.0001), 273.64±23.13 μm ( p <0.0001), and 283.09±19.66 μm ( p <0.0001) in the BRM group. Similar improvements in IRF and SRF levels in the patients were noted in both groups. Required number of doses of IRM and BRM was similar over the 12 month period in both groups. A similar profile of adverse events was noted in both the groups.

CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of IRM and BRM show similar efficacy and safety in Indian eyes with nAMD.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app