We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with epithelial ablation targeting actual epithelial thickness vs default laser platform values.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2022 May 2
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) with actual epithelial thickness vs default software values.
SETTING: Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
DESIGN: Prospective controlled study.
METHODS: Patients with refractive spherical error of -1.50 to -7.00 diopters (D) and refractive astigmatism up to 4.00 D were consecutively enrolled and divided into 2 groups: group 1 undergone tPRK with actual central and peripheral epithelial thickness input in right eyes, group 2 undergone tPRK with actual central and 10 mm higher peripheral epithelial thickness in right eyes. Left eyes in both groups underwent tPRK with default protocol. Outcome measures were induced refractive error, achieved optical zone (OZ), and wasted stromal tissue.
RESULTS: 83 patients were included in this study. Mean ± SD of induced spherical equivalent was +0.15 ± 0.39 D and +0.01 ± 0.35 D in right and left eyes of group 1 (P = .01) and +0.04 ± 0.22 D and +0.03 ± 0.23 D in right and left eyes of group 2 (P = .75), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between wasted tissue between right and left eyes in group 1 and group 2 (P = .77 and P = .49, respectively). OZ contraction was significantly higher in right compared with left eyes in group 1 (P = .05), but not in group 2 (P = .95).
CONCLUSIONS: In tPRK, refractive outcomes, wasted tissue, and OZ contraction depend little on preexisting corneal epithelial thickness in corneas with normal range epithelial thickness. However, OZ contraction may be a concern in lower amount of ablations.
SETTING: Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
DESIGN: Prospective controlled study.
METHODS: Patients with refractive spherical error of -1.50 to -7.00 diopters (D) and refractive astigmatism up to 4.00 D were consecutively enrolled and divided into 2 groups: group 1 undergone tPRK with actual central and peripheral epithelial thickness input in right eyes, group 2 undergone tPRK with actual central and 10 mm higher peripheral epithelial thickness in right eyes. Left eyes in both groups underwent tPRK with default protocol. Outcome measures were induced refractive error, achieved optical zone (OZ), and wasted stromal tissue.
RESULTS: 83 patients were included in this study. Mean ± SD of induced spherical equivalent was +0.15 ± 0.39 D and +0.01 ± 0.35 D in right and left eyes of group 1 (P = .01) and +0.04 ± 0.22 D and +0.03 ± 0.23 D in right and left eyes of group 2 (P = .75), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between wasted tissue between right and left eyes in group 1 and group 2 (P = .77 and P = .49, respectively). OZ contraction was significantly higher in right compared with left eyes in group 1 (P = .05), but not in group 2 (P = .95).
CONCLUSIONS: In tPRK, refractive outcomes, wasted tissue, and OZ contraction depend little on preexisting corneal epithelial thickness in corneas with normal range epithelial thickness. However, OZ contraction may be a concern in lower amount of ablations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app