We have located links that may give you full text access.
Class II HLA Eplet Mismatch Is a Risk Factor for De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Development and Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation Recipients.
Transplantation Proceedings 2018 October
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the correlation between class II HLA epitope mismatch and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episodes in kidney transplant recipients. In patients with AMR, epitope mismatch was also examined for each class II HLA mismatch to determine development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 167 kidney recipients. The numbers of eplet mismatches were compared between those with (n = 12) and without (n = 155) AMR, and the numbers of eplet mismatches for each type of mismatch in class II HLA among the AMR patients was also compared.
RESULTS: Twelve AMR episodes were diagnosed. The total number of eplet mismatches in AMR patients with either HLA-DR or HLA-DQ was greater than those in non-AMR patients (P = .0085 and P = .0041, respectively), though the incidence of HLA class II (DRB1 + DQB) mismatch was not significantly different between the groups (P = .095). The rate of non-AMR status in patients with ≥15 was lower than those with <15 HLA class II (DR or DQ) eplet mismatches (P = .0299 and P = .0128, respectively). Twelve AMR patients had 30 HLA-DRB1/3/4/5 and 32 HLA-DQA/B mismatches. In both HLA-DR and -DQ, de novo DSAs developed against HLAs in association with a greater number of eplet mismatches (P = .0046 and P = .0044, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Class II HLA eplet mismatch is a risk factor for de novo DSA and AMR in kidney transplantation recipients. Furthermore, the number of HLA class II eplet mismatches has greater significance as a risk factor than the number of conventional HLA class II mismatches.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 167 kidney recipients. The numbers of eplet mismatches were compared between those with (n = 12) and without (n = 155) AMR, and the numbers of eplet mismatches for each type of mismatch in class II HLA among the AMR patients was also compared.
RESULTS: Twelve AMR episodes were diagnosed. The total number of eplet mismatches in AMR patients with either HLA-DR or HLA-DQ was greater than those in non-AMR patients (P = .0085 and P = .0041, respectively), though the incidence of HLA class II (DRB1 + DQB) mismatch was not significantly different between the groups (P = .095). The rate of non-AMR status in patients with ≥15 was lower than those with <15 HLA class II (DR or DQ) eplet mismatches (P = .0299 and P = .0128, respectively). Twelve AMR patients had 30 HLA-DRB1/3/4/5 and 32 HLA-DQA/B mismatches. In both HLA-DR and -DQ, de novo DSAs developed against HLAs in association with a greater number of eplet mismatches (P = .0046 and P = .0044, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Class II HLA eplet mismatch is a risk factor for de novo DSA and AMR in kidney transplantation recipients. Furthermore, the number of HLA class II eplet mismatches has greater significance as a risk factor than the number of conventional HLA class II mismatches.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app