We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of flow-encoding strength on intravoxel incoherent motion in the liver.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2018 September 13
PURPOSE: To study the impact of variable flow-encoding strength on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) liver imaging of diffusion and perfusion.
THEORY: Signal attenuation in DWI arises from (1) intravoxel microvascular blood flow, which depends on the flow-encoding strength α (first gradient moment) of the diffusion-encoding waveform, and (2) intravoxel spin diffusion, which depends on the b-value of the diffusion-encoding gradient waveforms α and b-value. Both are linked to the diffusion-encoding gradient waveform and conventionally are not independently controlled.
METHODS: In this work a convex optimization framework was used to generate gradient waveforms with independent α and b-value. Thirty-six unique α and b-value sample points from 5 different gradient waveforms were used to reconstruct perfusion fraction (f), coefficient of diffusion (D), and blood velocity standard deviation (Vb ) maps using a recently proposed IVIM model. Faster acquisition strategies were evaluated with 1000 random subsampling strategies of 16, 8, and 4 α and b-value. Among the subsampled reconstructions, the sampling schemes that minimized the difference with the fully sampled reconstruction were reported.
RESULTS: Healthy volunteers (N = 9) were imaged on a 3T scanner. Liver perfusion and diffusion estimates using the fully sampled IVIM method were f = 0.19 ± 0.06, D = 1.15 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2 /s, and Vb = 5.22 ± 3.86 mm/s. No statistical differences were found between the fully sampled and 2-times undersampled reconstruction (f = 0.2 ± 0.07, D = 1.19 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2 /s, Vb = 5.79 ± 3.43 mm/s); 4-times undersampled (f = 0.2 ± 0.06, D = 1.15 ± 0.17 × 10-3 mm2 /s, Vb = 4.66 ± 3.61 mm/s), or 8-times undersampled ( f = 0.2 ± 0.06, D = 1.23 ± 0.22 × 10-3 mm2 /s, Vb = 4.99 ± 3.82 mm/s) approaches.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the IVIM signal's dependence on the b-value, the diffusion-encoding time and the flow-encoding strength and observe in vivo the ballistic regime signature of microperfusion in the liver. This work also demonstrates that using an IVIM model and sampling scheme matched to the ballistic regime, pixel-wise IVIM parameter maps are possible when sampling as few as 4 IVIM signals.
THEORY: Signal attenuation in DWI arises from (1) intravoxel microvascular blood flow, which depends on the flow-encoding strength α (first gradient moment) of the diffusion-encoding waveform, and (2) intravoxel spin diffusion, which depends on the b-value of the diffusion-encoding gradient waveforms α and b-value. Both are linked to the diffusion-encoding gradient waveform and conventionally are not independently controlled.
METHODS: In this work a convex optimization framework was used to generate gradient waveforms with independent α and b-value. Thirty-six unique α and b-value sample points from 5 different gradient waveforms were used to reconstruct perfusion fraction (f), coefficient of diffusion (D), and blood velocity standard deviation (Vb ) maps using a recently proposed IVIM model. Faster acquisition strategies were evaluated with 1000 random subsampling strategies of 16, 8, and 4 α and b-value. Among the subsampled reconstructions, the sampling schemes that minimized the difference with the fully sampled reconstruction were reported.
RESULTS: Healthy volunteers (N = 9) were imaged on a 3T scanner. Liver perfusion and diffusion estimates using the fully sampled IVIM method were f = 0.19 ± 0.06, D = 1.15 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2 /s, and Vb = 5.22 ± 3.86 mm/s. No statistical differences were found between the fully sampled and 2-times undersampled reconstruction (f = 0.2 ± 0.07, D = 1.19 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2 /s, Vb = 5.79 ± 3.43 mm/s); 4-times undersampled (f = 0.2 ± 0.06, D = 1.15 ± 0.17 × 10-3 mm2 /s, Vb = 4.66 ± 3.61 mm/s), or 8-times undersampled ( f = 0.2 ± 0.06, D = 1.23 ± 0.22 × 10-3 mm2 /s, Vb = 4.99 ± 3.82 mm/s) approaches.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the IVIM signal's dependence on the b-value, the diffusion-encoding time and the flow-encoding strength and observe in vivo the ballistic regime signature of microperfusion in the liver. This work also demonstrates that using an IVIM model and sampling scheme matched to the ballistic regime, pixel-wise IVIM parameter maps are possible when sampling as few as 4 IVIM signals.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app