We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prediction of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Respiratory Sounds Recorded Between Sleep Onset and Sleep Offset.
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2019 Februrary
OBJECTIVES: To develop a simple algorithm for prescreening of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the basis of respiratory sounds recorded during polysomnography during all sleep stages between sleep onset and offset.
METHODS: Patients who underwent attended, in-laboratory, full-night polysomnography were included. For all patients, audio recordings were performed with an air-conduction microphone during polysomnography. Analyses included all sleep stages (i.e., N1, N2, N3, rapid eye movement, and waking). After noise reduction preprocessing, data were segmented into 5-s windows and sound features were extracted. Prediction models were established and validated with 10-fold cross-validation by using simple logistic regression. Binary classifications were separately conducted for three different threshold criteria at apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 5, 15, or 30. Prediction model characteristics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (precision), negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic were computed.
RESULTS: A total of 116 subjects were included; their mean age, body mass index, and AHI were 50.4 years, 25.5 kg/m2 , and 23.0/hr, respectively. A total of 508 sound features were extracted from respiratory sounds recorded throughout sleep. Accuracies of binary classifiers at AHIs of 5, 15, and 30 were 82.7%, 84.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Prediction performances for the classifiers at AHIs of 5, 15, and 30 were AUC, 0.83, 0.901, and 0.91; sensitivity, 87.5%, 81.6%, and 60%; and specificity, 67.8%, 87.5%, and 94.1%. Respective precision values of the classifiers were 89.5%, 87.5%, and 78.2% for AHIs of 5, 15, and 30.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that our binary classifier predicted patients with AHI of ≥15 with sensitivity and specificity of >80% by using respiratory sounds during sleep. Since our prediction model included all sleep stage data, algorithms based on respiratory sounds may have a high value for prescreening OSA with mobile devices.
METHODS: Patients who underwent attended, in-laboratory, full-night polysomnography were included. For all patients, audio recordings were performed with an air-conduction microphone during polysomnography. Analyses included all sleep stages (i.e., N1, N2, N3, rapid eye movement, and waking). After noise reduction preprocessing, data were segmented into 5-s windows and sound features were extracted. Prediction models were established and validated with 10-fold cross-validation by using simple logistic regression. Binary classifications were separately conducted for three different threshold criteria at apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 5, 15, or 30. Prediction model characteristics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (precision), negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic were computed.
RESULTS: A total of 116 subjects were included; their mean age, body mass index, and AHI were 50.4 years, 25.5 kg/m2 , and 23.0/hr, respectively. A total of 508 sound features were extracted from respiratory sounds recorded throughout sleep. Accuracies of binary classifiers at AHIs of 5, 15, and 30 were 82.7%, 84.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Prediction performances for the classifiers at AHIs of 5, 15, and 30 were AUC, 0.83, 0.901, and 0.91; sensitivity, 87.5%, 81.6%, and 60%; and specificity, 67.8%, 87.5%, and 94.1%. Respective precision values of the classifiers were 89.5%, 87.5%, and 78.2% for AHIs of 5, 15, and 30.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that our binary classifier predicted patients with AHI of ≥15 with sensitivity and specificity of >80% by using respiratory sounds during sleep. Since our prediction model included all sleep stage data, algorithms based on respiratory sounds may have a high value for prescreening OSA with mobile devices.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app