We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of bone adaptation after modification in biomet standard alloplastic temporomandibular joint prostheses.
Journal of Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery 2018 October
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare bone adaptation after design modification in Biomet stock prostheses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) data of the patients treated with a Biomet TMJ replacement from 2010 to 2016 were recruited. Fossa prosthesis with a bulge and 4 types of condyle-ramus angle prostheses were virtually designed and implanted by computer-assisted simulation. The amount of bone trimming including fossa, mandibular ramus and bone graft were measured by ProPlan CMF 1.4 software. The differences between the original and modified prostheses were compared by SPSS 17.0 software for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: There were 54 patients' CT data included in the study. The amount of fossa bone trimming was 150.20 mm3 in the modified prosthesis and 281.82 mm3 in the original one. The amount of ramus bone trimming was 103.86 mm3 in the modified prosthesis and 229.45 mm3 in the original one. The amount of fossa bone grafting was 95.88 mm3 in the modified prosthesis and 263.03 mm3 in the original one. There were significant differences between them (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: The modified Biomet prostheses design requires less bone trimming and grafting for implantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) data of the patients treated with a Biomet TMJ replacement from 2010 to 2016 were recruited. Fossa prosthesis with a bulge and 4 types of condyle-ramus angle prostheses were virtually designed and implanted by computer-assisted simulation. The amount of bone trimming including fossa, mandibular ramus and bone graft were measured by ProPlan CMF 1.4 software. The differences between the original and modified prostheses were compared by SPSS 17.0 software for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: There were 54 patients' CT data included in the study. The amount of fossa bone trimming was 150.20 mm3 in the modified prosthesis and 281.82 mm3 in the original one. The amount of ramus bone trimming was 103.86 mm3 in the modified prosthesis and 229.45 mm3 in the original one. The amount of fossa bone grafting was 95.88 mm3 in the modified prosthesis and 263.03 mm3 in the original one. There were significant differences between them (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: The modified Biomet prostheses design requires less bone trimming and grafting for implantation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app