We have located links that may give you full text access.
Delay discounting associated with challenges to treatment adherence and glycemic control in young adults with type 1 diabetes.
Behavioural Processes 2018 December
INTRODUCTION: Many young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) face challenges in adherence to self-management practices and have above-target HbA1c. Poorer decision-making skills, indicated by greater delay discounting, may be linked to these factors.
METHODS: An online survey using social media ads targeted young adults aged 18-26 with T1D. Participants completed the Self-Care Inventory and the 5-trial delay discounting task and self-reported their last HbA1c value.
RESULTS: Discounting was significantly associated with treatment adherence (r = -.14, p < .05) and HbA1c (r = .18, p < .01). Adherence was also associated with HbA1c (r = -.26, p < .01). In a hierarchical regression, adding discounting explained significant additional variance in HbA1c after controlling demographics (F(1, 257) = 3.99, p < .05); adding adherence next explained significant additional variance in HbA1c (F(1, 256) = 12.96, p < .01). In the final model, adherence significantly explained HbA1c variance (β = -.21, p < .01).
DISCUSSION: These results expand the literature on cognitive factors and glycemic control among patients with T1D. Factors like delay discounting represent potentially modifiable risk factors targetable through interventions.
METHODS: An online survey using social media ads targeted young adults aged 18-26 with T1D. Participants completed the Self-Care Inventory and the 5-trial delay discounting task and self-reported their last HbA1c value.
RESULTS: Discounting was significantly associated with treatment adherence (r = -.14, p < .05) and HbA1c (r = .18, p < .01). Adherence was also associated with HbA1c (r = -.26, p < .01). In a hierarchical regression, adding discounting explained significant additional variance in HbA1c after controlling demographics (F(1, 257) = 3.99, p < .05); adding adherence next explained significant additional variance in HbA1c (F(1, 256) = 12.96, p < .01). In the final model, adherence significantly explained HbA1c variance (β = -.21, p < .01).
DISCUSSION: These results expand the literature on cognitive factors and glycemic control among patients with T1D. Factors like delay discounting represent potentially modifiable risk factors targetable through interventions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app