We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prognostic Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Severe Nonpenetrating Traumatic Brain Injury Requiring Decompressive Craniectomy.
World Neurosurgery 2018 April
BACKGROUND: Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful to predict outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI).
METHODS: This study compared the ability of the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) prognostic model with DAI on MRI to predict the 18-month neurologic outcome in 56 patients who had required decompressive craniectomy after TBI.
RESULTS: Of the 56 patients included in the study (19 scans occurred within 14 days; median time for all patients 24 days, interquartile range 14-42), 18 (32%) had evidence of DAI on the MRI scans. The presence of DAI on the MRI diffusion-weighted (DW) T2*-weighted gradient echo and susceptibility-weighted (SWI) sequences was associated with an increased risk of unfavorable outcome at 18 months compared with patients without DAI (44% vs. 17%, difference = 27%, 95% confidence interval 2.4-46.7%; P = 0.032), particularly when the brainstem was involved. However, neither the grading (I to IV) nor the number of brain regions with DAI was as good as the IMPACT model in discriminating between patients with unfavorable and favorable outcomes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.625 and 0.621 vs. 0.918, respectively; P < 0.001 for both comparisons). After adjustment for the IMPACT prognostic risks, DAI in different brain regions and the grading of DAI were also not independently associated with unfavorable outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic significance of DAI on MRI may, in part, be captured by the IMPACT prognostic model. More research is needed before MRI should be routinely used to prognosticate the outcomes in patients with TBI requiring decompressive craniectomy.
METHODS: This study compared the ability of the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) prognostic model with DAI on MRI to predict the 18-month neurologic outcome in 56 patients who had required decompressive craniectomy after TBI.
RESULTS: Of the 56 patients included in the study (19 scans occurred within 14 days; median time for all patients 24 days, interquartile range 14-42), 18 (32%) had evidence of DAI on the MRI scans. The presence of DAI on the MRI diffusion-weighted (DW) T2*-weighted gradient echo and susceptibility-weighted (SWI) sequences was associated with an increased risk of unfavorable outcome at 18 months compared with patients without DAI (44% vs. 17%, difference = 27%, 95% confidence interval 2.4-46.7%; P = 0.032), particularly when the brainstem was involved. However, neither the grading (I to IV) nor the number of brain regions with DAI was as good as the IMPACT model in discriminating between patients with unfavorable and favorable outcomes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.625 and 0.621 vs. 0.918, respectively; P < 0.001 for both comparisons). After adjustment for the IMPACT prognostic risks, DAI in different brain regions and the grading of DAI were also not independently associated with unfavorable outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic significance of DAI on MRI may, in part, be captured by the IMPACT prognostic model. More research is needed before MRI should be routinely used to prognosticate the outcomes in patients with TBI requiring decompressive craniectomy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app