We have located links that may give you full text access.
Impact of Cone-beam Computed Tomography on Treatment Planning for External Cervical Resorption and a Novel Axial Slice-based Classification System.
Journal of Endodontics 2018 Februrary
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare treatment plans for external cervical resorption (ECR) developed from periapical (PA) radiographs and cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging. The secondary aim of this study was to test a new classification system for ECR based on CBCT axial slice analysis.
METHODS: ECR was identified in 56 teeth (47 patients) from a database of 928 CBCT images. Strict exclusion criteria resulted in a sample of 30 ECR teeth (25 patients) and 10 ECR-free control teeth. Six examiners evaluated CBCT and matched PA images in separate sessions. Examiners classified ECR according to the Heithersay classification system and the novel Rohde classification system and provided a treatment plan.
RESULTS: All 30 ECR cases were identified by CBCT imaging and 29 by PA radiography. Interrater agreement was uniformly higher with CBCT imaging, and treatment plans developed from CBCT scans differed from those developed with PA radiographs in 56.7% of the cases. Examiners recommended ECR repair in the majority of cases (59.8% of CBCT images and 56.7% of PA radiographs). The Heithersay classification was dependent on the method of imaging with a greater prevalence of class 4 reported with CBCT imaging (P = .0016). The Rohde classification system significantly predicted the recommended treatment plan (P = .002 for Rohde class 2 and P = .043 for Rohde class 3). All Heithersay classifications failed to statistically predict treatment plans.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment plans changed between PA and CBCT imaging in the majority of cases evaluated. If CBCT imaging is available, the Rohde classification system may help guide treatment planning for cases of ECR.
METHODS: ECR was identified in 56 teeth (47 patients) from a database of 928 CBCT images. Strict exclusion criteria resulted in a sample of 30 ECR teeth (25 patients) and 10 ECR-free control teeth. Six examiners evaluated CBCT and matched PA images in separate sessions. Examiners classified ECR according to the Heithersay classification system and the novel Rohde classification system and provided a treatment plan.
RESULTS: All 30 ECR cases were identified by CBCT imaging and 29 by PA radiography. Interrater agreement was uniformly higher with CBCT imaging, and treatment plans developed from CBCT scans differed from those developed with PA radiographs in 56.7% of the cases. Examiners recommended ECR repair in the majority of cases (59.8% of CBCT images and 56.7% of PA radiographs). The Heithersay classification was dependent on the method of imaging with a greater prevalence of class 4 reported with CBCT imaging (P = .0016). The Rohde classification system significantly predicted the recommended treatment plan (P = .002 for Rohde class 2 and P = .043 for Rohde class 3). All Heithersay classifications failed to statistically predict treatment plans.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment plans changed between PA and CBCT imaging in the majority of cases evaluated. If CBCT imaging is available, the Rohde classification system may help guide treatment planning for cases of ECR.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app