We have located links that may give you full text access.
Opportunities to Reduce Diabetes Risk in Women of Reproductive Age: Assessment and Treatment of Prediabetes within a Large Integrated Delivery System.
Women's Health Issues : Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health 2017 November
BACKGROUND: Preventing diabetes before pregnancy may be important to improve maternal and infant outcomes. Although the preconception period is a crucial time to focus on chronic disease prevention, little is known about preventive services for reproductive-aged women at risk of developing diabetes.
METHODS: Using electronic health record data from patients at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, we identified 21,965 nonpregnant women aged 18 to 44 with incident prediabetes (PDM; fasting plasma glucose [FPG] = 100-125 or glycated hemoglobin A1c = 5.7%-6.4%) between 2007 and 2010. We looked for evidence of a "clinical response" to PDM in the 6 months after laboratory testing, defined as retesting of blood glucose levels, referral or attendance to health education, diagnosis of PDM, metformin initiation, or a clinical note of discussion of PDM. Multilevel models were used to examine the relationship between patient characteristics and clinical response, and to assess provider-level variation.
RESULTS: Fewer than one-half of women had a documented clinical response to the PDM-range laboratory result. Women with higher FPG values and body mass indexes were more likely to have a PDM diagnosis (FPG 120-125 vs. 100-119: OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.78-2.17; body mass index, 30-34 kg/m2 vs. <25 kg/m2 : OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.48) and have 'PDM' recorded in the notes (FPG 120-125 vs. 100-119: OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26; body mass index: 30-34 kg/m2 vs. <25 kg/m2 : OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.44-1.74). Provider-level variation was modest, except for metformin initiation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.8; p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Low clinical response to PDM among women of reproductive age suggests there are missed opportunities for diabetes prevention among this vulnerable population.
METHODS: Using electronic health record data from patients at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, we identified 21,965 nonpregnant women aged 18 to 44 with incident prediabetes (PDM; fasting plasma glucose [FPG] = 100-125 or glycated hemoglobin A1c = 5.7%-6.4%) between 2007 and 2010. We looked for evidence of a "clinical response" to PDM in the 6 months after laboratory testing, defined as retesting of blood glucose levels, referral or attendance to health education, diagnosis of PDM, metformin initiation, or a clinical note of discussion of PDM. Multilevel models were used to examine the relationship between patient characteristics and clinical response, and to assess provider-level variation.
RESULTS: Fewer than one-half of women had a documented clinical response to the PDM-range laboratory result. Women with higher FPG values and body mass indexes were more likely to have a PDM diagnosis (FPG 120-125 vs. 100-119: OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.78-2.17; body mass index, 30-34 kg/m2 vs. <25 kg/m2 : OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.48) and have 'PDM' recorded in the notes (FPG 120-125 vs. 100-119: OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26; body mass index: 30-34 kg/m2 vs. <25 kg/m2 : OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.44-1.74). Provider-level variation was modest, except for metformin initiation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.8; p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Low clinical response to PDM among women of reproductive age suggests there are missed opportunities for diabetes prevention among this vulnerable population.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app