We have located links that may give you full text access.
A Novel Retrieval Technique for Ureteral Stents Under Ultrasound Guidance in Male Patients.
Urology 2017 August
OBJECTIVE: To simply retrieve double-J stents in male patients under ultrasound guidance, a novel technique is developed and evaluated for efficiency, safety, and tolerability.
METHODS: Fifty-six male patients, ranging in age from 23 to 65 years old, were recruited from March to December 2015. Thirty patients (32 stents) underwent double-J stent retrieval by ultrasound guidance and 26 patients (28 stents) underwent cystoscopy retrieval separately. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Hematuria and leukocytosis were assessed every day postoperatively. A visual analog pain scale on a scale of 0-10 was used to assess procedure-related pain.
RESULTS: In the experimental group, 87.5% of ureteral stents were successfully removed. Using our novel technique without any local anesthesia, male patients experienced less pain compared with the cystoscopy group significantly (P < .001). The majority of complications were microscopic hematuria (39.28%), less than that in the cystoscopy group (69.23%, P = .027). Meanwhile, only few patients have leukocytosis in both groups (14.3% vs 11.5%, P > .05). Average procedure time was 7.35 ± 2.59 minutes longer than that of the standard group (5.13 ± 1.29 minutes; P < .001). However, it had been improved with increasing experience (r = 0.618, P < .001). In addition, this novel technique is cost-effective for clinical practice.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the possibility of ultrasound-guided retrieval technique in male patients. The safety and success rate of this new technique is similar to that of a conventional procedure. Whereas it is tolerable and cost effective for male and disabled patient bear with lithotomy position.
METHODS: Fifty-six male patients, ranging in age from 23 to 65 years old, were recruited from March to December 2015. Thirty patients (32 stents) underwent double-J stent retrieval by ultrasound guidance and 26 patients (28 stents) underwent cystoscopy retrieval separately. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Hematuria and leukocytosis were assessed every day postoperatively. A visual analog pain scale on a scale of 0-10 was used to assess procedure-related pain.
RESULTS: In the experimental group, 87.5% of ureteral stents were successfully removed. Using our novel technique without any local anesthesia, male patients experienced less pain compared with the cystoscopy group significantly (P < .001). The majority of complications were microscopic hematuria (39.28%), less than that in the cystoscopy group (69.23%, P = .027). Meanwhile, only few patients have leukocytosis in both groups (14.3% vs 11.5%, P > .05). Average procedure time was 7.35 ± 2.59 minutes longer than that of the standard group (5.13 ± 1.29 minutes; P < .001). However, it had been improved with increasing experience (r = 0.618, P < .001). In addition, this novel technique is cost-effective for clinical practice.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the possibility of ultrasound-guided retrieval technique in male patients. The safety and success rate of this new technique is similar to that of a conventional procedure. Whereas it is tolerable and cost effective for male and disabled patient bear with lithotomy position.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app