We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Simulating the Surgical Patient Pathway for Undergraduates.
Journal of Surgical Education 2017 March
BACKGROUND: A changing National Health Service structure and a reduction in time available for teaching have led to the increasing tensions in both clinical and university settings, to deliver high-quality patient care, research, and teaching. This, coupled with the increasing emphasis placed on ensuring safe surgical practice, has resulted in a need for change in teaching methods. We have designed an innovative surgical teaching program that aims to overcome these difficulties, by providing undergraduate medical students with a simulated surgical patient pathway.
METHODS: This prospective study compared 2 independent groups of medical students during their first-year clinical attachments, with the study group receiving the newly implemented simulated surgical patient pathway compared against a control group receiving traditional surgical education programs.
RESULTS: Students in the study group demonstrated a significantly improved subjective experience of surgical teaching, with greater awareness and confidence of safe surgical principles. Additionally, these students receiving the newly implemented simulation pathway performed significantly better than the control group in an objective knowledge-based assessment.
DISCUSSION: Simulation is not a substitute to clinical experience and it should not be considered as a replacement to real patients; but when used carefully, it can be an effective and essential adjunct in bridging the gap between classroom medicine and clinical practice.
METHODS: This prospective study compared 2 independent groups of medical students during their first-year clinical attachments, with the study group receiving the newly implemented simulated surgical patient pathway compared against a control group receiving traditional surgical education programs.
RESULTS: Students in the study group demonstrated a significantly improved subjective experience of surgical teaching, with greater awareness and confidence of safe surgical principles. Additionally, these students receiving the newly implemented simulation pathway performed significantly better than the control group in an objective knowledge-based assessment.
DISCUSSION: Simulation is not a substitute to clinical experience and it should not be considered as a replacement to real patients; but when used carefully, it can be an effective and essential adjunct in bridging the gap between classroom medicine and clinical practice.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app