We have located links that may give you full text access.
The effect of oral positioning on the hypopharyngeal airway.
Laryngoscope 2017 June
OBJECTIVES: It is generally assumed that mouth opening decreases the hypopharyngeal cross-sectional area (HA) and that tongue protrusion (TP) increases the HA. We hypothesize that a substantial number of patients do not exhibit this expected pattern.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort conducted at a tertiary academic center.
METHODS: With a flexible fiberoptic scope in position, the hypopharyngeal airway was visualized and assessed in 189 patients with the mouth closed. Patients were then asked to open the mouth with the tongue in neutral position (MOTN) to determine the effect on the airway. The same methodology was used to compare the airway with the MOTN versus TP. Basic demographics, including age, gender, body mass index, and presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), were collected. Student t test, Mantel-Haenszel chi-square, and Cochran-Armitage analyses were assessed for significant relationships and trends with oral positions.
RESULTS: Although mean HA decreased with MOTN (P < 0.0001), 33% of patients exhibited an increase in HA. Similarly, mean HA increased with TP (P = 0.0018); however, 38% of patients demonstrated a decrease in HA. There was no significant relationship in HA between OSA and non-OSA patients. For those with OSA, increasing severity trended toward a higher incidence of smaller HA with TP (P = 0.038).
CONCLUSION: The airway is typically most obstructed with mouth opening (MOTN) and most patent with tongue protrusion (TP). Nevertheless, hypopharyngeal changes with MOTN and TP followed a paradoxical pattern in one-third of our population. This may have implications in patient selection for targeted OSA treatment.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:1471-1475, 2017.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort conducted at a tertiary academic center.
METHODS: With a flexible fiberoptic scope in position, the hypopharyngeal airway was visualized and assessed in 189 patients with the mouth closed. Patients were then asked to open the mouth with the tongue in neutral position (MOTN) to determine the effect on the airway. The same methodology was used to compare the airway with the MOTN versus TP. Basic demographics, including age, gender, body mass index, and presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), were collected. Student t test, Mantel-Haenszel chi-square, and Cochran-Armitage analyses were assessed for significant relationships and trends with oral positions.
RESULTS: Although mean HA decreased with MOTN (P < 0.0001), 33% of patients exhibited an increase in HA. Similarly, mean HA increased with TP (P = 0.0018); however, 38% of patients demonstrated a decrease in HA. There was no significant relationship in HA between OSA and non-OSA patients. For those with OSA, increasing severity trended toward a higher incidence of smaller HA with TP (P = 0.038).
CONCLUSION: The airway is typically most obstructed with mouth opening (MOTN) and most patent with tongue protrusion (TP). Nevertheless, hypopharyngeal changes with MOTN and TP followed a paradoxical pattern in one-third of our population. This may have implications in patient selection for targeted OSA treatment.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:1471-1475, 2017.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app