We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
An evaluation of predictive factors involved in clinical or pathological response to primary chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: The usefulness of primary chemotherapy has been widely recognized and applied to routine clinical practice to improve prognosis by downstaging. Nevertheless, none of many trials has been able to show a positive effect of primary chemotherapy in terms of prognosis, and predictive factors of outcome have not been defined and are still under investigation.
METHODS: Primary chemotherapy was given to 50 patients with advanced breast cancer. Predictive factors involved in clinical or pathological response to primary chemotherapy (3 cycles of CE(F) therapy ) were investigated.
RESULTS: The response rate in all patients was 56.0% (CR: 3 patients PR: 25 patients) and 64.1% in patients without distant metastases. MIB-1 was related to the clinical response and EIC (extensive intraductal component) was related to the pathological response; the response was high in patients with EIC negative tumors. Responders had tumors with higher proliferative activity, which decreased significantly after chemotherapy. Patients with a decrease of more than 30% in proliferative activity after chemotherapy had significantly higher disease-free survival rates.
CONCLUSION: The proliferative activity and EIC status were useful predictors of clinical or pathological response to primary chemotherapy. A decrease in proliferative activity by chemotherapy significantly correlated with clinical response and reflected a favorable prognosis. The number of patients benefiting from primary chemotherapy might steadily increase by detecting these predictive factors.
METHODS: Primary chemotherapy was given to 50 patients with advanced breast cancer. Predictive factors involved in clinical or pathological response to primary chemotherapy (3 cycles of CE(F) therapy ) were investigated.
RESULTS: The response rate in all patients was 56.0% (CR: 3 patients PR: 25 patients) and 64.1% in patients without distant metastases. MIB-1 was related to the clinical response and EIC (extensive intraductal component) was related to the pathological response; the response was high in patients with EIC negative tumors. Responders had tumors with higher proliferative activity, which decreased significantly after chemotherapy. Patients with a decrease of more than 30% in proliferative activity after chemotherapy had significantly higher disease-free survival rates.
CONCLUSION: The proliferative activity and EIC status were useful predictors of clinical or pathological response to primary chemotherapy. A decrease in proliferative activity by chemotherapy significantly correlated with clinical response and reflected a favorable prognosis. The number of patients benefiting from primary chemotherapy might steadily increase by detecting these predictive factors.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app