We have located links that may give you full text access.
Thoracic outlet syndrome in overhead athletes.
JSES international. 2024 May
BACKGROUND: We aimed to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopy-assisted first-rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) between overhead athletes and nonathletes and investigate the return to same-level sports rate in overhead athletes.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 181 cases with TOS (75 women, 106 men; mean age, 28.4 years; range, 12-57 years) who underwent endoscopy-assisted first-rib resection. We divided into two groups: 79 overhead athletes and 102 nonathletes groups. A transaxillary approach for first-rib resection and neurovascular decompression was performed under magnified visualization. Endoscopic findings related to the neurovascular bundle, interscalene distance, and scalene muscle were evaluated intraoperatively. We assessed the Roos and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, return to same-level sports rate, and ball velocity.
RESULTS: Overhead athletes were significantly more likely to be men, younger, used the dominant side more frequently, and have a larger physique, more shoulder and elbow pain, and shorter symptom duration. The outcomes of the Roos score revealed significant differences in excellent or good results between overhead athletes (91.1%) and nonathletes (62.8%). The two groups significantly differed in preoperative and postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and recovery rate scores ( P = .007, < .001, < .001).
CONCLUSION: Overhead athletes with TOS were more likely to be men, younger, dominant side more frequently, and have more shoulder and elbow pain, and a shorter symptom duration. Endoscopy-assisted transaxillary first-rib resection and neurolysis provided superior clinical outcomes in overhead athletes with TOS compared with nonathletes and a high return-to-same-level-play rate in sports.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 181 cases with TOS (75 women, 106 men; mean age, 28.4 years; range, 12-57 years) who underwent endoscopy-assisted first-rib resection. We divided into two groups: 79 overhead athletes and 102 nonathletes groups. A transaxillary approach for first-rib resection and neurovascular decompression was performed under magnified visualization. Endoscopic findings related to the neurovascular bundle, interscalene distance, and scalene muscle were evaluated intraoperatively. We assessed the Roos and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, return to same-level sports rate, and ball velocity.
RESULTS: Overhead athletes were significantly more likely to be men, younger, used the dominant side more frequently, and have a larger physique, more shoulder and elbow pain, and shorter symptom duration. The outcomes of the Roos score revealed significant differences in excellent or good results between overhead athletes (91.1%) and nonathletes (62.8%). The two groups significantly differed in preoperative and postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and recovery rate scores ( P = .007, < .001, < .001).
CONCLUSION: Overhead athletes with TOS were more likely to be men, younger, dominant side more frequently, and have more shoulder and elbow pain, and a shorter symptom duration. Endoscopy-assisted transaxillary first-rib resection and neurolysis provided superior clinical outcomes in overhead athletes with TOS compared with nonathletes and a high return-to-same-level-play rate in sports.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Hemodynamic Support in Sepsis.Anesthesiology 2024 June 2
The New Challenge of Obesity - Obesity-Associated Nephropathy.Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity 2024
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2023: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.Advances in Therapy 2024 May 15
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app