We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prognostic factors for resected cases with gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
International Journal of Surgery 2024 April 4
OBJECTIVE: Current meta-analysis was performed to systematically evaluate the potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) among resected cases with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically retrieved and hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were directly extracted from the original study or roughly estimated via Tierney's method. Standard Parmar modifications were used to determine pooled HRs.
RESULTS: A total of 36 studies with 11502 cases were identified. Pooled results of univariate analyses indicated that advanced age (HR=1.02, P=0.00020), concurrent gallstone disease (HR=1.22, P=0.00200), elevated preoperative CA199 level (HR=1.93, P<0.00001), advanced T stage (HR=3.09, P<0.00001), lymph node metastasis (HR=2.78, P<0.00001), peri-neural invasion (HR=2.20, P<0.00001), lymph-vascular invasion (HR=2.37, P<0.00001), vascular invasion (HR=2.28, P<0.00001), poorly differentiated tumor (HR=3.22, P<0.00001), hepatic side tumor (HR=1.85, P<0.00001), proximal tumor (neck/cystic duct) (HR=1.78, P<0.00001), combined bile duct resection (HR=1.45, P<0.00001), and positive surgical margin (HR=2.90, P<0.00001) were well-established prognostic factors. Pathological subtypes (P=0.53000) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.70000) were not prognostic factors. Pooled results of multi-variate analyses indicated that age, gallstone disease, preoperative CA199, T stage, lymph node metastasis, peri-neural invasion, lymph-vascular invasion, tumor differentiation status, tumor location (peritoneal side vs hepatic side), surgical margin, combined bile duct resection, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: Various prognostic factors have been identified beyond the 8th AJCC staging system. By incorporating these factors into a prognostic model, a more individualized prognostication and treatment regime would be developed. Upcoming multinational studies are required for the further refine and validation.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically retrieved and hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were directly extracted from the original study or roughly estimated via Tierney's method. Standard Parmar modifications were used to determine pooled HRs.
RESULTS: A total of 36 studies with 11502 cases were identified. Pooled results of univariate analyses indicated that advanced age (HR=1.02, P=0.00020), concurrent gallstone disease (HR=1.22, P=0.00200), elevated preoperative CA199 level (HR=1.93, P<0.00001), advanced T stage (HR=3.09, P<0.00001), lymph node metastasis (HR=2.78, P<0.00001), peri-neural invasion (HR=2.20, P<0.00001), lymph-vascular invasion (HR=2.37, P<0.00001), vascular invasion (HR=2.28, P<0.00001), poorly differentiated tumor (HR=3.22, P<0.00001), hepatic side tumor (HR=1.85, P<0.00001), proximal tumor (neck/cystic duct) (HR=1.78, P<0.00001), combined bile duct resection (HR=1.45, P<0.00001), and positive surgical margin (HR=2.90, P<0.00001) were well-established prognostic factors. Pathological subtypes (P=0.53000) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.70000) were not prognostic factors. Pooled results of multi-variate analyses indicated that age, gallstone disease, preoperative CA199, T stage, lymph node metastasis, peri-neural invasion, lymph-vascular invasion, tumor differentiation status, tumor location (peritoneal side vs hepatic side), surgical margin, combined bile duct resection, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: Various prognostic factors have been identified beyond the 8th AJCC staging system. By incorporating these factors into a prognostic model, a more individualized prognostication and treatment regime would be developed. Upcoming multinational studies are required for the further refine and validation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2024 May 9
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app