We have located links that may give you full text access.
Intra-bin correction and inter-bin compensation of respiratory motion in free-running 5D whole-heart MRI.
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2024 March 17
BACKGROUND: Free-running cardiac and respiratory motion-resolved whole-heart 5D MRI can reduce scan planning and provide a means of evaluating respiratory-driven changes in clinical parameters of interest. However, respiratory-resolved imaging can be limited by user-defined parameters which create trade-offs between residual artifact and motion blur. In this work, we develop and validate strategies for both correction of intra-bin and compensation of inter-bin respiratory motion to improve the quality of 5D MRI.
METHODS: Each component of the reconstruction framework was systematically validated and compared to the previously established 5D approach using simulated free-running data (N=50) and a cohort of 32 patients with congenital heart disease. The impact of intra-bin respiratory motion correction was evaluated in terms of image sharpness while inter-bin respiratory motion compensation was evaluated in terms of reconstruction error, compression of respiratory motion, and image sharpness. The full reconstruction framework (IIMC 5D) was evaluated in terms of image sharpness and scoring of image quality by expert reviewers.
RESULTS: Intra-bin motion correction provides significantly (p < 10-3 ) sharper images for both simulated and patient data. Inter-bin motion compensation results in significant (p < 10-3 ) lower reconstruction error, lower motion compression, and higher sharpness in both simulated (10/11) and patient (9/11) data. The combined framework resulted in significantly (p < 10-3 ) sharper IIMC 5D reconstructions (End-Exp: 0.45±0.09, End-Ins: 0.46±0.10) relative to the previously established 5D implementation (End-Exp: 0.43±0.08, End-Ins: 0.39±0.09). Similarly, image scoring by three expert reviewers was significantly (p < 10-3 ) higher using IIMC 5D (End-Exp: 3.39±0.44, End-Ins: 3.32±0.45) relative to 5D images (End-Exp: 3.02±0.54, End-Ins: 2.45±0.52).
CONCLUSION: The proposed IIMC reconstruction significantly improves the quality of 5D whole-heart MRI. This may be exploited for higher resolution or abbreviated scan. Further investigation of the diagnostic impact of this framework and comparison to gold-standards is needed to understand its full clinical utility including exploration of respiratory-driven changes in physiological measurements of interest.
METHODS: Each component of the reconstruction framework was systematically validated and compared to the previously established 5D approach using simulated free-running data (N=50) and a cohort of 32 patients with congenital heart disease. The impact of intra-bin respiratory motion correction was evaluated in terms of image sharpness while inter-bin respiratory motion compensation was evaluated in terms of reconstruction error, compression of respiratory motion, and image sharpness. The full reconstruction framework (IIMC 5D) was evaluated in terms of image sharpness and scoring of image quality by expert reviewers.
RESULTS: Intra-bin motion correction provides significantly (p < 10-3 ) sharper images for both simulated and patient data. Inter-bin motion compensation results in significant (p < 10-3 ) lower reconstruction error, lower motion compression, and higher sharpness in both simulated (10/11) and patient (9/11) data. The combined framework resulted in significantly (p < 10-3 ) sharper IIMC 5D reconstructions (End-Exp: 0.45±0.09, End-Ins: 0.46±0.10) relative to the previously established 5D implementation (End-Exp: 0.43±0.08, End-Ins: 0.39±0.09). Similarly, image scoring by three expert reviewers was significantly (p < 10-3 ) higher using IIMC 5D (End-Exp: 3.39±0.44, End-Ins: 3.32±0.45) relative to 5D images (End-Exp: 3.02±0.54, End-Ins: 2.45±0.52).
CONCLUSION: The proposed IIMC reconstruction significantly improves the quality of 5D whole-heart MRI. This may be exploited for higher resolution or abbreviated scan. Further investigation of the diagnostic impact of this framework and comparison to gold-standards is needed to understand its full clinical utility including exploration of respiratory-driven changes in physiological measurements of interest.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2024 May 9
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app