Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and B Cell Immune Reconstitution following Allo-HCT with Prophylactic, Post-Transplant Rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Post-transplant, prophylactic rituximab has successfully decreased cGHVD rates in clinical trials, but the durability of this strategy is uncertain. The long-terms effect of post-HCT B cell depletion on immune reconstitution, B cell function, and infectious complications are also unknown.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we provide 10 year follow-up and correlative analyses on patients given post-HCT, prophylactic rituximab. The objective of the study is to examine the durability of cGVHD protection as well as the long-term effect of rituximab prophylaxis on protective immune reconstitution, B cell function, and alloantibody formation.

STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 35 patients given prophylactic rituximab on phase II clinical trial. Clinical outcomes included cGVHD development, relapse and survival outcomes, and infectious outcomes. Correlative analyses included B cell subset analysis, development of antibodies to infectious antigens, and, for male patients receiving female donor grafts, development of antibodies to HY antigens. To further investigate the effect of rituximab on immune reconstitution and function, we also analyzed 43 similarly transplanted patients who did not receive post- or peri-HCT rituximab as a comparator group.

RESULTS: For patients who received rituximab, the 8-year cumulative incidence of cGHVD and freedom from immunosuppression were 20.0% and 76.2%, respectively. Importantly, no late incidences of cGVHD developed beyond 14 months post-HCT. Relative to patients who did not receive rituximab, post-HCT rituximab was associated with increased B cell aplasia at 1 year post-HCT (42.9% vs 11% of patients, p = 0.037); by 3 years post-HCT, this aplasia resolved. Patients who received rituximab also had a significantly lower proportion of IgD+/CD38+ transitional B cells at 3 years post-HCT (78.8% vs 89.9%, p = 0.039); at 10 years post-HCT, this percentage remained markedly decreased at 50.7%. Rituximab prophylaxis altered B cell function. In male patients receiving female donor grafts, fewer patients developed HY antibodies at 3 years post-HCT (20% vs 78%, p = 0.04). At 10 years post-HCT, HY antibody production remained decreased at 33%. Rituximab prophylaxis was also associated with significantly lower antibody response to tetanus and EBV infectious antigens as well as lower IgG levels. Despite these changes, post-HCT was not associated with increased infections, although patients who received rituximab required intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) supplementation more frequently than those who did not (62.9% vs 32.6% of patients, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Prior data on the efficacy and feasibility of rituximab prophylaxis are durable, with persistent reduction in cGVHD. Rituximab prophylaxis also results in lasting B cell immunologic changes, with altered B cell subset composition and decreased alloantibody formation. Associated infectious risks were not increased, perhaps mitigated by high IVIG use.