We have located links that may give you full text access.
Alveolar Buccal Bone Overbuilding Before Tooth Extraction: A Preclinical Study.
BACKGROUND: After tooth extraction, a physiological shrinkage of the alveolar ridge occurs. Applying a buccal overbuilding some months before tooth extraction may create a stiffer hard tissue that might protect the alveolar crest from resorption. Hence, the aim of this experiment was to evaluate the dimensional changes in the alveolar crest after buccal overbuilding performed before tooth extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At the test sites, an alveolar crest overbuilding was performed on the buccal aspect of the distal root of the third premolar using xenograft covered with a collagen membrane. No treatment was applied at the control sites. After 3 months, the distal roots of both third premolars were extracted and implants were immediately installed into the alveolus allowing a non-submerged healing. After 3 months, biopsies were collected.
RESULTS: At the histological analyses, no statistically significant differences in hard tissue dimensions were found. The buccal bone plate at the test sites presented a tendency of higher resorption compared to the control sites. However, if the contribution of the residues of biomaterial was considered, a higher volumetric gain was registered at the test than at the control sites.
CONCLUSIONS: The buccal overbuilding performed before tooth extraction did not contribute to the preservation of the alveolar crest dimensions after extraction. This could be due to failure to incorporate the graft into the newly formed bone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At the test sites, an alveolar crest overbuilding was performed on the buccal aspect of the distal root of the third premolar using xenograft covered with a collagen membrane. No treatment was applied at the control sites. After 3 months, the distal roots of both third premolars were extracted and implants were immediately installed into the alveolus allowing a non-submerged healing. After 3 months, biopsies were collected.
RESULTS: At the histological analyses, no statistically significant differences in hard tissue dimensions were found. The buccal bone plate at the test sites presented a tendency of higher resorption compared to the control sites. However, if the contribution of the residues of biomaterial was considered, a higher volumetric gain was registered at the test than at the control sites.
CONCLUSIONS: The buccal overbuilding performed before tooth extraction did not contribute to the preservation of the alveolar crest dimensions after extraction. This could be due to failure to incorporate the graft into the newly formed bone.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app