We have located links that may give you full text access.
Ultrasonographic measurements of the inferior vena cava diameter in newborns: is it a useful tool for choosing an umbilical venous catheter?
OBJECTIVES: The primary outcomes of this study were to evaluate the diameters of the inferior vena cava (IVC) in a cohort of newborns and the correlation between newborn weight and IVC diameter. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the concordance between the measurements performed by the two investigators.
METHODS: Two blind examiners performed an ultrasonographic (US) evaluation of the IVC diameter in neonates with a weight ranging from 2 to 4 kg. The exclusion criteria included hemodynamic instability, known vascular malformations, and major congenital malformations.
RESULTS: A total of 143 neonates were enrolled between June 2019 and January 2021. All the US examinations were performed in the first 3 days of life. After dividing the patients into two groups according to their weight at the time of examination (2.0-2.99 kg and 3.0-4.0 kg), the median IVC diameters measured by examiner 1 were 3.1 mm (interquartile range 2.8-3.4) and 3.4 mm (interquartile range 2.9-3.8) ( p = 0.003) for the two groups, respectively. The median IVC diameters measured by examiner 2 were 3.1 mm (interquartile range 2.6-3.3) and 3.3 mm (interquartile range 2.8-3.8) ( p = 0.004) for the two groups, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95).
CONCLUSION: The IVC diameter values varied widely from 1.2 to 5.2 mm in newborns weighing 2-4 kg, and a low correlation between newborn weight and IVC diameter was found, so measuring IVC diameter may be a recommended step prior to inserting a umbilical venous catheter (UVC). The concordance between operators was good. We contemplated that the IVC diameter could be a potentially useful tool to identify the most appropriate UVC, thus reducing the risk of catheter-related thrombosis.
METHODS: Two blind examiners performed an ultrasonographic (US) evaluation of the IVC diameter in neonates with a weight ranging from 2 to 4 kg. The exclusion criteria included hemodynamic instability, known vascular malformations, and major congenital malformations.
RESULTS: A total of 143 neonates were enrolled between June 2019 and January 2021. All the US examinations were performed in the first 3 days of life. After dividing the patients into two groups according to their weight at the time of examination (2.0-2.99 kg and 3.0-4.0 kg), the median IVC diameters measured by examiner 1 were 3.1 mm (interquartile range 2.8-3.4) and 3.4 mm (interquartile range 2.9-3.8) ( p = 0.003) for the two groups, respectively. The median IVC diameters measured by examiner 2 were 3.1 mm (interquartile range 2.6-3.3) and 3.3 mm (interquartile range 2.8-3.8) ( p = 0.004) for the two groups, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95).
CONCLUSION: The IVC diameter values varied widely from 1.2 to 5.2 mm in newborns weighing 2-4 kg, and a low correlation between newborn weight and IVC diameter was found, so measuring IVC diameter may be a recommended step prior to inserting a umbilical venous catheter (UVC). The concordance between operators was good. We contemplated that the IVC diameter could be a potentially useful tool to identify the most appropriate UVC, thus reducing the risk of catheter-related thrombosis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2024 May 9
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app