Measurement accuracy of a microwave doppler sensor beneath the mattress as a continuous respiratory rate monitor: a method comparison study.

PURPOSE: Non-contact continuous respiratory rate monitoring is preferred for early detection of patient deterioration. However, this technique is under development; a gold standard respiratory monitor has not been established. Therefore, this prospective observational method comparison study aimed to compare the measurement accuracy of a non-contact continuous respiratory rate monitor, a microwave Doppler sensor positioned beneath the mattress, with that of other monitors.

METHODS: The respiratory rate of intensive care unit patients was simultaneously measured using a microwave Doppler sensor, capnography, thoracic impedance pneumography, and a piezoelectric sensor beneath the mattress. Bias and 95% limits of agreement between the respiratory rate measured using capnography (standard reference) and that measured using the other three methods were calculated using Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measures. Clarke error grid (CEG) analysis evaluated the sensor's ability to assist in correct clinical decision-making.

RESULTS: Eighteen participants were included, and 2,307 data points were analyzed. The bias values (95% limits of agreement) of the microwave Doppler sensor, thoracic impedance pneumography, and piezoelectric sensor were 0.2 (- 4.8 to 5.2), 1.5 (- 4.4 to 7.4), and 0.4 (- 4.0 to 4.8) breaths per minute, respectively. Clinical decisions evaluated using CEG analyses were correct 98.1% of the time for the microwave Doppler sensor, which was similar to the performance of the other devices.

CONCLUSION: The microwave Doppler sensor had a small bias but relatively low precision, similar to other devices. In CEG analyses, the risk of each monitor leading to inadequate clinical decision-making was low.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000038900, February 1, 2020.