We have located links that may give you full text access.
Increased Risk of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Patients with Chronic Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mediterranean journal of rheumatology. 2023 June
INTRODUCTION: The association between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and chronic urticaria (CU) has been suggested in the literature although the amount of evidence is still relatively limited. We aimed to combine all available studies on this association using systematic review and meta-analysis technique.
METHODS: Potentially eligible studies were identified from Medline and EMBASE from inception to February 2023 using search strategy that comprised of terms for "chronic urticaria" and "systemic lupus erythematosus". The eligible study must consist of one group of patients with CU and another group of comparators without CU and must compare the prevalence of SLE in each group and report effect size with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We extracted such data from each study to calculate a pooled odds ratio using the generic inverse variance method with random-effect model. Funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies.
RESULTS: A total of 5,155 articles were identified. After two rounds of independent review by four investigators, five studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found an increased prevalence of SLE among patients with CU compared with individuals without CU with the pooled odds ratio of 5.03 (95% CI, 2.57-9.85, I2 of 93%).
CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients with CU had a significantly increased risk of SLE compared to individuals without CU.
METHODS: Potentially eligible studies were identified from Medline and EMBASE from inception to February 2023 using search strategy that comprised of terms for "chronic urticaria" and "systemic lupus erythematosus". The eligible study must consist of one group of patients with CU and another group of comparators without CU and must compare the prevalence of SLE in each group and report effect size with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We extracted such data from each study to calculate a pooled odds ratio using the generic inverse variance method with random-effect model. Funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies.
RESULTS: A total of 5,155 articles were identified. After two rounds of independent review by four investigators, five studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found an increased prevalence of SLE among patients with CU compared with individuals without CU with the pooled odds ratio of 5.03 (95% CI, 2.57-9.85, I2 of 93%).
CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients with CU had a significantly increased risk of SLE compared to individuals without CU.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app