Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Early Treatment of Acetabular Fractures via an Anterior Approach Increases Blood Loss but not Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if time from hospital admission to surgery for acetabular fractures using an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach affected blood loss.

DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study.

SETTING: Three level 1 trauma centers at 2 academic institutions.

PATIENTS: 195 adult (age >18) patients with adequate records to complete analysis and no pre-existing coagulopathy.

INTERVENTION: AIP approach without other significant same day procedures (irrigation and debridement and external fixation were the only other allowed procedures).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Multiple methods for evaluating blood loss were investigated, including estimated blood loss (EBL), calculated blood loss (CBL), and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirement.

RESULTS: On continuous linear analysis, increasing time from admission to surgery was significantly associated with decreasing CBL at 24 hours (-1.45 mL per hour by Gross, p=0.003; -0.440 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance, p=0.003) and 3 days (-1.69 mL per hour by Gross, p=0.013; -0.497 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance, p=0.010) postoperative, but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. Using 48-hours from admission to surgery to define early versus delayed, blood loss was significantly greater in the early group compared to delayed [453 (IQR 277-733) mL early versus 364 (IQR 160-661) delayed by Gross, p=0.017; 165 (IQR 99-249) g early versus 143 (IQR 55-238) g delayed by Hgb balance, p=0.035], but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. Additionally, in multivariate linear regression, neither giving tranexamic acid nor administering prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism on the morning of surgery affected blood loss at 24 hours or 3 days postoperative.

CONCLUSION: There is higher blood loss with early surgery using an AIP approach, but early surgery did not affect PRBC transfusion and may not be clinically relevant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app