Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prospective Randomized Trial of Anti-Thrombotic Strategies Following Great Saphenous Vein Ablation Using Injectable Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (Varithena™).

OBJECTIVE: Post-ablation deep vein thrombosis (DVT) represents a potentially serious complication following Varithena™ polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM) ablation. The following primary outcomes were assessed: Whether (1) adjunctive Apixaban anticoagulation or (2) mechanical DVS saline flushing could reduce SFJ thrombus extension (PASTE) and/or DVT compared with compression alone, following GSV PEM ablation.

METHODS: Varithena™ 1% PEM ablation patients were randomized to: 1) SFJ compression, 2) Compression and DVS saline flushing, or 3) Compression, DVS saline flushing, and 5 days post-procedural 5mg BID oral Apixaban anticoagulation. Duplex imaging was obtained 7-10 days post-PEM ablation and PASTE/DVT incidence (primary endpoint) was compared between groups at this time point.

RESULTS: 304 limbs in 257 patients were treated with PEM. 103 limbs received SFJ compression (Group C, 33.8%), 101 received compression and deep venous flushing (Group D, 32.9%), and 100 received compression, deep flush, and anticoagulation (Group A, 33.2%). Mean ultrasound follow-up time was 9.7 days (all patients) with primary GSV closure rate of 92.4%. SFJ PASTE (II-IV) occurred in 0.9%, 1.0%, and 0% (groups C, D, and A, respectively). DVT occurred in 16.7%, 14.7%, and 1.98% (groups C, D, and A, chi-square, p = 0.002). Group A patients receiving apixaban anticoagulation had significant reduction in DVT compared with Group C (1.98% vs 16.7%, chi square, p < 0.001); likewise, Group A patients had significantly reduced DVT occurrence compared with Group D (14.7% vs. 1.98%, chi square p = 0.00162) while Groups C and D were not statistically different (16.7% vs 14.7%, chi-square, p = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS: (1) Neither adjunctive DVS flushing, nor anticoagulation reduced clinically relevant SFJ PASTE (II-IV) incidence, which remained similarly low across all groups and ranged between 0%-1% regardless of adjunctive DVS flushing or anticoagulation. This was significantly lower than prior reports (2.3%-4.1%). (2) DVS flushing had no influence on the rate of DVT. Observed PEM-induced DVT incidence using SFJ compression alone or compression with DVS flushing (16.7% and 14.7%, respectively) was significantly higher than prior reports (2.5%-9.6%). This may relate to the greater extent of AK/BK GSV territory treated in the present study. (3) 5 days post-procedural 5mg BID oral Apixaban anticoagulation significantly reduced DVT occurrence to 1.98%, compared with non-anticoagulated patients (16.7%). This is comparable to DVT rates reported after EVTA (0.7-1.7%). (4) Postprocedural apixaban anticoagulation may have a significant preventive role in reducing DVT occurrence after PEM ablation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app