Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Standard Versus Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement and Concomitant Myocardial Revascularization: 5-year Bi-Center Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical outcomes of two generations of pericardial bioprostheses in concomitant aortic valve and coronary artery bypass graft surgery were analyzed.

METHODS: Patients were recruited from two European centers and divided into 2 groups based on the type of aortic bioprosthesis used: Edwards Intuity EliteTM rapid deployment bioprostheses or standard Edwards Magna Ease (Edwards Lifesciences, Corporation, Irvine, California, US). A propensity score weighting approach was used for data analysis.

RESULTS: 285 patients were included: 144 (50.5%) in the Rapid Deployment group and 141 (49.5%) in the Magna Ease group. Thirty-day mortality was 2.8% (Rapid Deployment) and 5% (Magna Ease) (P = 0.089). Significantly shorter times of aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass were observed in the Rapid Deployment cohort [94 vs 120 min; (P < 0.001); 128 vs 160 min (P < 0.001)]. The Rapid Deployment group was associated with a lower median transvalvular gradient at discharge and follow-up (both P < 0.001). However, 5-year survival was not different, being 93% in Rapid Deployment patients and 91% in the Magna Ease group [HR 0.89 (CI 95%:0.38-2.09), P = 0.784]. The 5-year cumulative incidence of combined events (including percutaneous coronary interventions, endocarditis, thromboembolic events, rehospitalizations, and bleeding) favored the Magna Ease group [16.1% (Rapid Deployment) vs 7.3% (Magna Ease), [HR 2.38 (CI 95%:1.03-5.52), P = 0.043]. However, this turned similar when the Cox model analysis was adjusted for revascularization variables (P = 0.067).

CONCLUSIONS: Rapid deployment and Magna Ease pericardial bioprostheses used in concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery revascularization provide equivalent clinical and haemodynamic 5-year outcomes, despite constant lower transvalvular gradients and shorter surgical operating times observed with rapid deployment technology.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app