We have located links that may give you full text access.
[Laparothoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with esophageal-gastric intrapleural anastomosis].
Khirurgiia 2020
OBJECTIVE: To describe the methodology of laparothoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in surgical treatment of esophageal cancer and compare early outcomes of this procedure with conventional Ivor Lewis surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 30 laparothoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomies followed by non-hardware esophageal-gastric intrapleural anastomosis for esophageal cancer. All procedures have been performed for the period 2016-2019 at the Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (suturing of anastomosis was based on the method of professor A.S. Allakhverdyan).
RESULTS: Laparothoracoscopic esophagectomy is characterized by higher surgery time by 136.57 min ( p =0.012), less duration of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation by 77.5 min ( p =0.042), postoperative ICU-stay by 2.25 hours ( p =0.021), blood loss by 550 ml ( p =0,000), duration of postoperative fasting by 2 days ( p =0.034), hospital-stay by 8 days ( p =0.021) compared to open esophagectomy. There were no significant between-group differences in the number of resected lymph nodes ( p =0.142). Incidence of esophageal-gastric anastomosis failure is insignificantly higher in the OE group (χ2 =1.89; p =0.075). Incidence of pulmonary complications (pneumonia, chylothorax, paresis of the vocal cords, pleural empyema) is less in the LTSE group ( p <0.05). Cardiovascular morbidity is significantly lower in the LTSE group ( p <0.05). A 30-day mortality rate was similar in both groups (χ2 =2.56; p =0.0253).
CONCLUSION: Early results of laparothoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy are superior to the results of conventional Ivor Lewis surgery in surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 30 laparothoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomies followed by non-hardware esophageal-gastric intrapleural anastomosis for esophageal cancer. All procedures have been performed for the period 2016-2019 at the Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (suturing of anastomosis was based on the method of professor A.S. Allakhverdyan).
RESULTS: Laparothoracoscopic esophagectomy is characterized by higher surgery time by 136.57 min ( p =0.012), less duration of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation by 77.5 min ( p =0.042), postoperative ICU-stay by 2.25 hours ( p =0.021), blood loss by 550 ml ( p =0,000), duration of postoperative fasting by 2 days ( p =0.034), hospital-stay by 8 days ( p =0.021) compared to open esophagectomy. There were no significant between-group differences in the number of resected lymph nodes ( p =0.142). Incidence of esophageal-gastric anastomosis failure is insignificantly higher in the OE group (χ2 =1.89; p =0.075). Incidence of pulmonary complications (pneumonia, chylothorax, paresis of the vocal cords, pleural empyema) is less in the LTSE group ( p <0.05). Cardiovascular morbidity is significantly lower in the LTSE group ( p <0.05). A 30-day mortality rate was similar in both groups (χ2 =2.56; p =0.0253).
CONCLUSION: Early results of laparothoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy are superior to the results of conventional Ivor Lewis surgery in surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Revascularization Strategy in Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 March 27
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app