We have located links that may give you full text access.
[Comparison of two kinds of pain assessment tools for ICU patients in oral and maxillofacial surgery].
PURPOSE: To explore the validity of two kinds of pain assessment tools for ICU patients after oral and maxillofacial surgery.
METHODS: A total of 30 ICU patients post oral and maxillofacial surgery were included, and the patients' pain was assessed by 2 independent research nurses with 2 kinds of pain assessment tools (CPOT and BPS) at the same time under non-pain stimulations and pain stimulation (non-invasive blood pressure measurement and closed endotracheal intubation suction). The repeated assessment point included rest state, during intervention, 20 minutes after intervention. For conscious patients, pain score was also obtained by 1 researcher with numerical rating scale (NRS) after closed endotracheal intubation suction. The data were analyzed by reliability and validation test using SPSS 17.0 software package.
RESULTS: The internal consistency of CPOT and BPS was 0.809 and 0.878, respectively. In the analysis of discriminant validity, the pain stimulations scores of 2 scales were significantly higher than those in other assessment point (P<0.05); In the criterion validity, Spearman correlation coefficient between CPOT score and NRS score was 0.542, 0.461 between BPS score and NRS score during pain stimulation process. The results of sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed that when the CPOT score was cut by 3.5 point, the sensitivity and specificity were 55% and 96.7%, respectively, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.799; when the BPS score was cut by 7 point, the sensitivity and specificity respectively were 50% and 100%, respectively, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.743.
CONCLUSIONS: Both CPOT and BPS have good reliability and validity, which may be used to assess the pain of ICU patients in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
METHODS: A total of 30 ICU patients post oral and maxillofacial surgery were included, and the patients' pain was assessed by 2 independent research nurses with 2 kinds of pain assessment tools (CPOT and BPS) at the same time under non-pain stimulations and pain stimulation (non-invasive blood pressure measurement and closed endotracheal intubation suction). The repeated assessment point included rest state, during intervention, 20 minutes after intervention. For conscious patients, pain score was also obtained by 1 researcher with numerical rating scale (NRS) after closed endotracheal intubation suction. The data were analyzed by reliability and validation test using SPSS 17.0 software package.
RESULTS: The internal consistency of CPOT and BPS was 0.809 and 0.878, respectively. In the analysis of discriminant validity, the pain stimulations scores of 2 scales were significantly higher than those in other assessment point (P<0.05); In the criterion validity, Spearman correlation coefficient between CPOT score and NRS score was 0.542, 0.461 between BPS score and NRS score during pain stimulation process. The results of sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed that when the CPOT score was cut by 3.5 point, the sensitivity and specificity were 55% and 96.7%, respectively, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.799; when the BPS score was cut by 7 point, the sensitivity and specificity respectively were 50% and 100%, respectively, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.743.
CONCLUSIONS: Both CPOT and BPS have good reliability and validity, which may be used to assess the pain of ICU patients in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app