Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A Comparison of Excisional Volume Loss Calculation Methods to Predict Functional Outcome After Partial Nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Functional volume loss (FVL) is a significant predictor of kidney function decline after partial nephrectomy (PN). Here, we sought to assess two different methods for quantifying FVL post-PN: imaging-based tissue segmentation (TS) vs pathological analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS: From a single surgeon series, we performed a retrospective analysis of 42 patients who underwent PN for a cT1 renal mass between 2015 and 2017. The association between TS and pathological analysis at a median follow-up of 6 months (range: 3-9 months) was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. The association between pathological analysis, TS analysis, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline at 6 months was evaluated using a multivariable linear mixed-effects models. For pathological analysis, dimensions of the specimen and tumor were extracted from pathology reports. FVL was calculated as [specimen volume (Length*Width*Height*π/6) - tumor volume (Length*Width*Height* π/6)]. For TS analysis, preoperative cross-sectional imaging was used (MRI n = 20; CT n = 22). FVL was calculated as [(overall kidney volume) - (tumor volume) - (cyst volume of renal cysts >1 cm)]. Postoperative functional volume was subtracted from preoperative functional volume to assess FVL post-PN for TS method.

RESULTS: eGFR significantly decreased from baseline to postoperative 6 months (-5.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; p = 0.004). Even though there was a correlation between the two methods (coefficient = 0.245, p < 0.001), pathological analysis underestimated volume loss (32.2 mL vs 5.76 mL, p < 0.001). In multivariate linear regression analysis, TS analysis was significantly associated with a decline in eGFR (β = 0.084, 95% CI = -0.02, 0.15; p = 0.012), whereas pathological analysis was not (β = 0.02, 95% CI = -0.24, 0.28; p = 0.87).

CONCLUSION: Pathological analysis underestimates parenchymal volume loss. Only imaging-based TS method is associated with change in eGFR post-PN.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app