We have located links that may give you full text access.
Single-shot CT after wrist trauma: impact on detection accuracy and treatment of fractures.
Skeletal Radiology 2019 June
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate accuracy of fracture detection and therapeutic impact of a single-shot CT protocol as a primary imaging tool in all patients with clinical suspicion of wrist injury, and evaluate the resulting impact on therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a single-institution study on all patients with suspicion of fractures of the wrist and carpus. All patients underwent conventional radiography, thereafter single-shot wrist CT, and then 1-year follow-up. Physicians and radiologists prospectively scored likelihood of fracture presence on a five-point scale before and after CT. Three surgeons proposed a treatment regimen (functional, cast, reduction, or operative) based on clinical and radiological data, first with knowledge of conventional radiography, and then with knowledge of CT. The reference standard for fracture presence was based on all data. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and calculated proportion of wrists with treatment changes due to CT imaging.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients participated (63% female, mean age 53, range, 18-87 years old) with 100 wrist CTs. Conventional radiography detected true-positive fractures in 45, and CT in 61 wrists. The areas under the curve for fracture detection were 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93) for conventional radiography and 0.97 (95% CI 0.93-1.00) for CT. Treatment changed in 24 (24%, 95% CI 16-33%) - 31 (31%, 95% CI 23-41%) wrists, mostly involving a decrease in the rate of cast immobilization.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-shot CT in patients with clinical suspicion of wrist injury increases accuracy of fracture detection. This has a significant impact therapy in this population, mainly on cast immobilization.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: We registered the study at www.clinicaltrials.gov , NL43482.091.13.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a single-institution study on all patients with suspicion of fractures of the wrist and carpus. All patients underwent conventional radiography, thereafter single-shot wrist CT, and then 1-year follow-up. Physicians and radiologists prospectively scored likelihood of fracture presence on a five-point scale before and after CT. Three surgeons proposed a treatment regimen (functional, cast, reduction, or operative) based on clinical and radiological data, first with knowledge of conventional radiography, and then with knowledge of CT. The reference standard for fracture presence was based on all data. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and calculated proportion of wrists with treatment changes due to CT imaging.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients participated (63% female, mean age 53, range, 18-87 years old) with 100 wrist CTs. Conventional radiography detected true-positive fractures in 45, and CT in 61 wrists. The areas under the curve for fracture detection were 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93) for conventional radiography and 0.97 (95% CI 0.93-1.00) for CT. Treatment changed in 24 (24%, 95% CI 16-33%) - 31 (31%, 95% CI 23-41%) wrists, mostly involving a decrease in the rate of cast immobilization.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-shot CT in patients with clinical suspicion of wrist injury increases accuracy of fracture detection. This has a significant impact therapy in this population, mainly on cast immobilization.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: We registered the study at www.clinicaltrials.gov , NL43482.091.13.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app