Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Factors of compliance with the wearing of elastic compression stockings in a Sub-Saharan population].

INTRODUCTION: Elastic venous compression is the basic treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Very little data exist in sub-Saharan Africa concerning the wearing of compression stockings.

AIM: To determine the factors of compliance with wearing elastic compression stockings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study involved 200 consecutive patients (93 cases of DVT, 94 cases of CVI, 13 cases of DVT and CVI). Data on compliance with wearing compression stockings and the factors influencing this compliance were collected.

RESULTS: The average age was 51±15 years old (range 17 and 91 years old). The sex ratio was 1. The majority of patients (78.5%) performed their occupation in a standing position, for more than 8hours per day for 80.5%. DVT were preferentially on the left side (52.9%) and proximal (44.4%). Concerning the CVI, the predominant symptoms were class C3 (52.3%), C4 and C5 (43.9%) of the CEAP classification. Bilateral involvement was dominant (53.3%) and the large saphenous vein was the most affected (66.9%) compared with 33.1% for the small saphenous vein exclusively. The most common type of stockings prescribed was the lower mid-thighs (57%), followed by the pantyhose (30%), in classes 3 (63%) and 2 (36.5%). The majority of patients (75%) agreed to wear their stockings after prescription with a good compliance rate of 58.5% at the beginning of the prescription. At the time of the study, this rate was 11%. The optimal duration of compliance with wearing compression stockings was 6 months (64%). Over 12 months this rate fell to 7.5%. The main causes were stocking-related compression discomfort (36.7%), patient neglect (21.5%), threading difficulties (16.9%), and an unfavorable working environment (8.7%). The determining factors of compliance with wearing of stockings were living in a couple (68.4% vs 54.2, P=0.04), CVI (53% vs 38.2%, P=0.04) and C3 (39% vs 80%), C4 (37.5% vs 17%), C5 (18% vs 3%) CVI (P=0.0005).

CONCLUSION: Compliance with wearing elastic compression stockings is mediocre. The main factors of non-compliance are discomfort, threading difficulties and patient neglect.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app