We have located links that may give you full text access.
[Factors of compliance with the wearing of elastic compression stockings in a Sub-Saharan population].
Journal de Médecine Vasculaire 2017 July
INTRODUCTION: Elastic venous compression is the basic treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Very little data exist in sub-Saharan Africa concerning the wearing of compression stockings.
AIM: To determine the factors of compliance with wearing elastic compression stockings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study involved 200 consecutive patients (93 cases of DVT, 94 cases of CVI, 13 cases of DVT and CVI). Data on compliance with wearing compression stockings and the factors influencing this compliance were collected.
RESULTS: The average age was 51±15 years old (range 17 and 91 years old). The sex ratio was 1. The majority of patients (78.5%) performed their occupation in a standing position, for more than 8hours per day for 80.5%. DVT were preferentially on the left side (52.9%) and proximal (44.4%). Concerning the CVI, the predominant symptoms were class C3 (52.3%), C4 and C5 (43.9%) of the CEAP classification. Bilateral involvement was dominant (53.3%) and the large saphenous vein was the most affected (66.9%) compared with 33.1% for the small saphenous vein exclusively. The most common type of stockings prescribed was the lower mid-thighs (57%), followed by the pantyhose (30%), in classes 3 (63%) and 2 (36.5%). The majority of patients (75%) agreed to wear their stockings after prescription with a good compliance rate of 58.5% at the beginning of the prescription. At the time of the study, this rate was 11%. The optimal duration of compliance with wearing compression stockings was 6 months (64%). Over 12 months this rate fell to 7.5%. The main causes were stocking-related compression discomfort (36.7%), patient neglect (21.5%), threading difficulties (16.9%), and an unfavorable working environment (8.7%). The determining factors of compliance with wearing of stockings were living in a couple (68.4% vs 54.2, P=0.04), CVI (53% vs 38.2%, P=0.04) and C3 (39% vs 80%), C4 (37.5% vs 17%), C5 (18% vs 3%) CVI (P=0.0005).
CONCLUSION: Compliance with wearing elastic compression stockings is mediocre. The main factors of non-compliance are discomfort, threading difficulties and patient neglect.
AIM: To determine the factors of compliance with wearing elastic compression stockings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study involved 200 consecutive patients (93 cases of DVT, 94 cases of CVI, 13 cases of DVT and CVI). Data on compliance with wearing compression stockings and the factors influencing this compliance were collected.
RESULTS: The average age was 51±15 years old (range 17 and 91 years old). The sex ratio was 1. The majority of patients (78.5%) performed their occupation in a standing position, for more than 8hours per day for 80.5%. DVT were preferentially on the left side (52.9%) and proximal (44.4%). Concerning the CVI, the predominant symptoms were class C3 (52.3%), C4 and C5 (43.9%) of the CEAP classification. Bilateral involvement was dominant (53.3%) and the large saphenous vein was the most affected (66.9%) compared with 33.1% for the small saphenous vein exclusively. The most common type of stockings prescribed was the lower mid-thighs (57%), followed by the pantyhose (30%), in classes 3 (63%) and 2 (36.5%). The majority of patients (75%) agreed to wear their stockings after prescription with a good compliance rate of 58.5% at the beginning of the prescription. At the time of the study, this rate was 11%. The optimal duration of compliance with wearing compression stockings was 6 months (64%). Over 12 months this rate fell to 7.5%. The main causes were stocking-related compression discomfort (36.7%), patient neglect (21.5%), threading difficulties (16.9%), and an unfavorable working environment (8.7%). The determining factors of compliance with wearing of stockings were living in a couple (68.4% vs 54.2, P=0.04), CVI (53% vs 38.2%, P=0.04) and C3 (39% vs 80%), C4 (37.5% vs 17%), C5 (18% vs 3%) CVI (P=0.0005).
CONCLUSION: Compliance with wearing elastic compression stockings is mediocre. The main factors of non-compliance are discomfort, threading difficulties and patient neglect.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app