We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
ANCA-associated vasculitis: a comparison of cases presenting to nephrology and rheumatology services.
QJM : Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians 2016 December
BACKGROUND: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) -associated vasculitis (AAV) is a disease characterized by inflammation of small vessels and detectable ANCA in the circulation. Patients may develop a broad spectrum of clinical features ranging from indolent sino-nasal disease and rashes to fulminant renal failure or acute life-threatening pulmonary haemorrhage. Consequently, patients with AAV present to a variety of specialties including nephrology and rheumatology, whose training and approaches to management of such patients may differ. There is little literature comparing patients presenting to different specialties and their outcomes.
METHODS: We compared two cohorts of patients with ANCA-positive AAV presenting to either the rheumatology or nephrology department at Galway University Hospitals from June 2002 to July 2011. A standardized data collection form was used to collect information regarding baseline demographics, manifestations of AAV, initial management, relapses and complications.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in this study (15 rheumatology/30 nephrology). The nephrology cohort was older, had a higher C-reactive protein, Birmingham Vascular Activity Score and ANCA titer at presentation compared to the rheumatology group. Induction treatment varied between the cohorts with rheumatology patients most commonly receiving a combination of oral corticosteroids (73%) and methotrexate (60%) and nephrology patients receiving a combination of intravenous corticosteroids (93%) and cyclophosphamide (90%). Fifty-three percent of the rheumatology patients who completed induction therapy relapsed compared to 30% of the nephrology patients.
CONCLUSION: This study presents two different cohorts of patients with the same disease that were managed by two different disciplines. It highlights the heterogeneity of AAV and the importance of interdisciplinary communication and cooperation when managing these patients.
METHODS: We compared two cohorts of patients with ANCA-positive AAV presenting to either the rheumatology or nephrology department at Galway University Hospitals from June 2002 to July 2011. A standardized data collection form was used to collect information regarding baseline demographics, manifestations of AAV, initial management, relapses and complications.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in this study (15 rheumatology/30 nephrology). The nephrology cohort was older, had a higher C-reactive protein, Birmingham Vascular Activity Score and ANCA titer at presentation compared to the rheumatology group. Induction treatment varied between the cohorts with rheumatology patients most commonly receiving a combination of oral corticosteroids (73%) and methotrexate (60%) and nephrology patients receiving a combination of intravenous corticosteroids (93%) and cyclophosphamide (90%). Fifty-three percent of the rheumatology patients who completed induction therapy relapsed compared to 30% of the nephrology patients.
CONCLUSION: This study presents two different cohorts of patients with the same disease that were managed by two different disciplines. It highlights the heterogeneity of AAV and the importance of interdisciplinary communication and cooperation when managing these patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app