We have located links that may give you full text access.
Characterizing the Magnitude and Risk Factors of Functional and Anatomic Limb Lengthening in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Journal of Arthroplasty 2024 May 3
BACKGROUND: In revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is little information on the magnitude of potential limb lengthening, risk factors for lengthening, or its impact on patient-reported outcome measures. We aimed to quantify limb length alteration during revision TKA and assess risk factors for lengthening.
METHODS: We identified 150 patients over a 3-year period who underwent revision TKA and had preoperative and postoperative EOS hip-to-ankle standing radiographs. The average patient age was 64 years, 51% were women; 68% had a pre-operative varus deformity and 21% had a pre-operative valgus deformity. Outcomes assessed included change in functional and anatomic limb length, risk factors for lengthening, and clinical outcome scores, including the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and the Veterans RAND 12-item (VR12) Physical and Mental Scores.
RESULTS: There were 124 patients (83%) who had functional limb lengthening, and 108 patients (72%) had anatomic limb lengthening. Patients had an average functional limb lengthening of 7 mm (range, -22 to 35) and an average anatomic limb lengthening of 5 mm (range, -16 to 31). Patients undergoing revision for instability experienced significantly greater anatomic lengthening (7.6 versus 4.6, P = 0.047). Patients who had ≥ 10° of deformity were more likely to be functionally lengthened (91 versus 79%) and had significantly greater average functional lengthening (12 versus 6 mm; P = 0.003). There was no significant change in clinical outcome scores at 6 weeks and 1 year for patients lengthened ≥ 5 or 10 mm compared to those not lengthened as substantially.
CONCLUSIONS: There is major potential for functional and anatomic limb lengthening following revision TKA, with greater preoperative deformity and revision for instability being risk factors for lengthening.
METHODS: We identified 150 patients over a 3-year period who underwent revision TKA and had preoperative and postoperative EOS hip-to-ankle standing radiographs. The average patient age was 64 years, 51% were women; 68% had a pre-operative varus deformity and 21% had a pre-operative valgus deformity. Outcomes assessed included change in functional and anatomic limb length, risk factors for lengthening, and clinical outcome scores, including the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and the Veterans RAND 12-item (VR12) Physical and Mental Scores.
RESULTS: There were 124 patients (83%) who had functional limb lengthening, and 108 patients (72%) had anatomic limb lengthening. Patients had an average functional limb lengthening of 7 mm (range, -22 to 35) and an average anatomic limb lengthening of 5 mm (range, -16 to 31). Patients undergoing revision for instability experienced significantly greater anatomic lengthening (7.6 versus 4.6, P = 0.047). Patients who had ≥ 10° of deformity were more likely to be functionally lengthened (91 versus 79%) and had significantly greater average functional lengthening (12 versus 6 mm; P = 0.003). There was no significant change in clinical outcome scores at 6 weeks and 1 year for patients lengthened ≥ 5 or 10 mm compared to those not lengthened as substantially.
CONCLUSIONS: There is major potential for functional and anatomic limb lengthening following revision TKA, with greater preoperative deformity and revision for instability being risk factors for lengthening.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a review of definition, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention and treatment.BMC Nephrology 2024 April 23
Hemodynamic Support in Sepsis.Anesthesiology 2024 June 2
The New Challenge of Obesity - Obesity-Associated Nephropathy.Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity 2024
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app