We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Considerable Variation in Current Coronoid Height and Fracture Measurement Techniques: A Systematic Review.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2024 March 22
BACKGROUND: Coronoid fractures usually occur in the presence of a significant osseo-ligamentous injury to the elbow. Fracture size and location correlate with degree of instability and many authors have attempted to analyze the effect of fracture variation on decision making and outcome. There remains no standardized technique for measuring coronoid height or fracture size. The aim of this study was to appraise the literature regarding techniques for coronoid height measurement in order to understand variation.
METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A search was performed to identify studies with either a description of coronoid height, fracture size or bone loss using the terms (Coronoid) AND (Measurement) OR (Size) OR (Height). Articles were shortlisted by screening for topic relevance based on title, abstract and, if required, full text review. Exclusion criteria were non-English articles, those on non-human species or parts other than the ulna coronoid process, and studies that included patients with pre-existing elbow pathology. Shortlisted articles were grouped based on study type, imaging modality, measurement technique and measurement parameter as well as its location along the coronoid.
RESULTS: 30 out of the initially identified 494 articles met the inclusion criteria. 21 articles were clinical studies, 8 were cadaveric studies and 1 combined patients as well as cadavers. A variety of imaging modalities (plain radiographs, 2D CT, 3D CT, MRI or a combination of these) were used with CT scan (either 2D images or 3D reconstructions or both) being the most common modality used by 21 studies. Measurement technique also varied from uniplanar linear measurements in 15 studies to multiplanar area and volumetric measurements in 6 studies to techniques describing various angles and indices as an indirect measure of coronoid height in 8 studies. Across the 30 shortlisted studies, 19 different measurement techniques were identified. 15 studies measured normal coronoid height while the other 15 measured intact coronoid and/or fracture fragment height. The location of this measurement was also variable between studies with measurements at the apex of the coronoid in 24/30 (80%) of studies. Measurement accuracy was assessed by only 1 study. 12/30 (40%) studies reported on the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of their measurement technique.
CONCLUSION: The systemic review demonstrated considerable variability between studies that report coronoid height or fracture size measurements. This variability makes comparison of coronoid height or fracture measurements and recommendations based on these between studies unreliable. There is need for development of a consistent, easy to use and reproducible technique for coronoid height and bone loss.
METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A search was performed to identify studies with either a description of coronoid height, fracture size or bone loss using the terms (Coronoid) AND (Measurement) OR (Size) OR (Height). Articles were shortlisted by screening for topic relevance based on title, abstract and, if required, full text review. Exclusion criteria were non-English articles, those on non-human species or parts other than the ulna coronoid process, and studies that included patients with pre-existing elbow pathology. Shortlisted articles were grouped based on study type, imaging modality, measurement technique and measurement parameter as well as its location along the coronoid.
RESULTS: 30 out of the initially identified 494 articles met the inclusion criteria. 21 articles were clinical studies, 8 were cadaveric studies and 1 combined patients as well as cadavers. A variety of imaging modalities (plain radiographs, 2D CT, 3D CT, MRI or a combination of these) were used with CT scan (either 2D images or 3D reconstructions or both) being the most common modality used by 21 studies. Measurement technique also varied from uniplanar linear measurements in 15 studies to multiplanar area and volumetric measurements in 6 studies to techniques describing various angles and indices as an indirect measure of coronoid height in 8 studies. Across the 30 shortlisted studies, 19 different measurement techniques were identified. 15 studies measured normal coronoid height while the other 15 measured intact coronoid and/or fracture fragment height. The location of this measurement was also variable between studies with measurements at the apex of the coronoid in 24/30 (80%) of studies. Measurement accuracy was assessed by only 1 study. 12/30 (40%) studies reported on the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of their measurement technique.
CONCLUSION: The systemic review demonstrated considerable variability between studies that report coronoid height or fracture size measurements. This variability makes comparison of coronoid height or fracture measurements and recommendations based on these between studies unreliable. There is need for development of a consistent, easy to use and reproducible technique for coronoid height and bone loss.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2024 May 9
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app