We have located links that may give you full text access.
An Improved k-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Recognition and Classification of Thyroid Nodules.
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine : Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 2024 Februrary 24
OBJECTIVES: To complete the task of automatic recognition and classification of thyroid nodules and solve the problem of high classification error rates when the samples are imbalanced.
METHODS: An improved k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm is proposed and a method for automatic thyroid nodule classification based on the improved KNN algorithm is established. In the improved KNN algorithm, we consider not only the number of class labels for various classes of data in KNNs, but also the corresponding weights. And we use the Minkowski distance measure instead of the Euclidean distance measure.
RESULTS: A total of 508 ultrasound images of thyroid nodules, including 415 benign nodules and 93 malignant nodules, were used in the paper. Experimental results show the improved KNN has 0.872549 accuracy, 0.867347 precision, 1 recall, and 0.928962 F1-score. At the same time, we also considered the influence of different distance weights, the value of k, different distance measures on the classification results.
CONCLUSIONS: A comparison result shows that our method has a better performance than the traditional KNN and other classical machine learning methods.
METHODS: An improved k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm is proposed and a method for automatic thyroid nodule classification based on the improved KNN algorithm is established. In the improved KNN algorithm, we consider not only the number of class labels for various classes of data in KNNs, but also the corresponding weights. And we use the Minkowski distance measure instead of the Euclidean distance measure.
RESULTS: A total of 508 ultrasound images of thyroid nodules, including 415 benign nodules and 93 malignant nodules, were used in the paper. Experimental results show the improved KNN has 0.872549 accuracy, 0.867347 precision, 1 recall, and 0.928962 F1-score. At the same time, we also considered the influence of different distance weights, the value of k, different distance measures on the classification results.
CONCLUSIONS: A comparison result shows that our method has a better performance than the traditional KNN and other classical machine learning methods.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
SGLT2 Inhibitors in Kidney Diseases-A Narrative Review.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 May 2
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app