Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Are percutaneous epiphysiodesis and Phemister technique effective in the treatment of leg-length discrepancy? A systematic review.

Epiphysiodesis is considered the preferred treatment for children predicted to have leg length discrepancies (LLDs) 2-5 cm at maturity. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature on the effectiveness of permanent epiphysiodesis for LLD treatment, and secondarily to address the reported complications of permanent epiphysiodesis techniques. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for studies on skeletally immature patients with LLD treated with permanent epiphysiodesis. The extracted outcome categories were effectiveness of epiphysiodesis (LLD measurements pre/post-operatively, successful/unsuccessful), physeal fusion/arrest, and complications that were graded on severity. Forty-nine studies (3051 patients) were included, 1550 underwent Phemister/modified Phemister epiphysiodesis and 1501 percutaneous epiphysiodesis (PE). Total successful permanent epiphysiodesis surgeries (16 studies) were 73.7% (516/700). Only 13 out of 23 studies had a mean final LLD of less than 1.5 cm. In total, 17.5% (513/2936) of complications were reported. 57 angular deformities were reported (1.9%). Phemister technique had higher percentage of complications (39%) than PE (19.1%) in total, but when failure to achieve adequate reduction in LLD was not included, complication rates for both were close to 14%. However, severe complications were 10.2% for Phemister group and 5.1% for PE. The high complication rates and the relative low success rate call for optimization of the timing and the applied techniques when treating LLD with permanent epiphysiodesis. Phemister technique was found to have higher percentage of severe complications than PE. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023435177).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app