We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Association of Vestibular Schwannoma Volume With Facial Nerve Outcomes After Surgical Resection.
Laryngoscope 2021 April
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between tumor size and facial nerve outcomes following vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection.
STUDY DESIGN: Single institutional retrospective chart review of all adult patients with untreated sporadic VS who underwent surgical resection from 2008 to 2018 with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 1 year of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was facial nerve outcome as assessed by the House-Brackmann facial nerve grading system.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients, 54.5% female, with a median age of 49 years (20-76 years), were identified who underwent VS resection. Surgical resection was performed by translabyrinthine (76.7%), middle cranial fossa (14.4%), retrosigmoid (7.2%), and transpromontorial (1.8%) approaches. The median tumor diameter and volume were 25.3 mm (range: 4.1-47.1 mm) and 3.17 cm3 (range: 0.01-30.6 cm3 ), respectively. The median follow-up was 24.2 months (range: 12-114.2 months). Gross total resection was performed in 79% of cases, with residual tumor identified on MRI in 17% of cases. For patients with tumors <3 cm3 , 92.7% had grade 1 or 2 facial function after at least 1 year follow-up, compared to 81.2% for those with tumors >3 cm3 (univariate logistic regression OR = 2.9, P = .03). Tumor volume >3 cm3 was predictive of facial weakness on multivariate regression analysis (OR = 7.4, P = .02) when controlling for surgical approach, internal auditory canal extension, anterior extension, age, gender, and extent of resection.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor volume >3 cm3 is associated with worse facial nerve outcomes 12 months following surgical resection.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Laryngoscope, 131:E1328-E1334, 2021.
STUDY DESIGN: Single institutional retrospective chart review of all adult patients with untreated sporadic VS who underwent surgical resection from 2008 to 2018 with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 1 year of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was facial nerve outcome as assessed by the House-Brackmann facial nerve grading system.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients, 54.5% female, with a median age of 49 years (20-76 years), were identified who underwent VS resection. Surgical resection was performed by translabyrinthine (76.7%), middle cranial fossa (14.4%), retrosigmoid (7.2%), and transpromontorial (1.8%) approaches. The median tumor diameter and volume were 25.3 mm (range: 4.1-47.1 mm) and 3.17 cm3 (range: 0.01-30.6 cm3 ), respectively. The median follow-up was 24.2 months (range: 12-114.2 months). Gross total resection was performed in 79% of cases, with residual tumor identified on MRI in 17% of cases. For patients with tumors <3 cm3 , 92.7% had grade 1 or 2 facial function after at least 1 year follow-up, compared to 81.2% for those with tumors >3 cm3 (univariate logistic regression OR = 2.9, P = .03). Tumor volume >3 cm3 was predictive of facial weakness on multivariate regression analysis (OR = 7.4, P = .02) when controlling for surgical approach, internal auditory canal extension, anterior extension, age, gender, and extent of resection.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor volume >3 cm3 is associated with worse facial nerve outcomes 12 months following surgical resection.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Laryngoscope, 131:E1328-E1334, 2021.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
SGLT2 Inhibitors in Kidney Diseases-A Narrative Review.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 May 2
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app