We have located links that may give you full text access.
Food insecurity and coping strategies associate with higher risk of anxiety and depression among South African households with children.
Public Health Nutrition 2024 April 6
OBJECTIVE: To investigate food insecurity and related coping strategies, and their associations with the risk of anxiety and depression, among South African households with children.
DESIGN: Nationally representative cross-sectional study. Tools for assessing food insecurity, coping strategies, risk of anxiety and depression were assessed from the Community Childhood Hunger Identification Project, Coping Strategies Index, General Anxiety Disorder-7, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9, respectively. We used ordered logistic regression to test associations of food insecurity and coping strategies with the risk of anxiety and depression. Moderating effects of each coping strategy were tested in the associations of food insecurity with anxiety and depression.
SETTING: South Africa, post COVID-19 restrictions, May-June 2022.
PARTICIPANTS: 1,774 adults, weighted to 20,955,234 households.
RESULTS: Food insecurity prevalence was 23.7% among households with children. All coping strategies were used to some extent, but relying on less preferred and less expensive foods was the most used strategy (85.5% of food insecure households). Moving to a higher level of food insecurity was associated with >1.6 greater odds of being in a higher risk of anxiety and depression. Sending a household member to beg for food was the strongest associated factor (ORs=1.7, P<0.001). All coping strategies partly moderated (lessened) the associations of food insecurity with a higher risk of anxiety and depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity among households with children was high following the COVID-19 pandemic. Collaborative efforts between government, private sector and civil society to eradicate food insecurity should prioritise poorer households with children, as these populations are the most vulnerable.
DESIGN: Nationally representative cross-sectional study. Tools for assessing food insecurity, coping strategies, risk of anxiety and depression were assessed from the Community Childhood Hunger Identification Project, Coping Strategies Index, General Anxiety Disorder-7, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9, respectively. We used ordered logistic regression to test associations of food insecurity and coping strategies with the risk of anxiety and depression. Moderating effects of each coping strategy were tested in the associations of food insecurity with anxiety and depression.
SETTING: South Africa, post COVID-19 restrictions, May-June 2022.
PARTICIPANTS: 1,774 adults, weighted to 20,955,234 households.
RESULTS: Food insecurity prevalence was 23.7% among households with children. All coping strategies were used to some extent, but relying on less preferred and less expensive foods was the most used strategy (85.5% of food insecure households). Moving to a higher level of food insecurity was associated with >1.6 greater odds of being in a higher risk of anxiety and depression. Sending a household member to beg for food was the strongest associated factor (ORs=1.7, P<0.001). All coping strategies partly moderated (lessened) the associations of food insecurity with a higher risk of anxiety and depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity among households with children was high following the COVID-19 pandemic. Collaborative efforts between government, private sector and civil society to eradicate food insecurity should prioritise poorer households with children, as these populations are the most vulnerable.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app