Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Experimental evaluation of the plunger technique: A method of cyclic manual aspiration thrombectomy for treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy via direct aspiration is a rapid treatment for acute ischemic stroke. This method often results in the partial ingestion of the clot or "corking" of the catheter tip. Cyclic aspiration may take advantage of the mechanical properties of the clot, resulting in greater clot ingestion and overall procedure success.

METHODS: An in vitro analysis was performed comparing static and cyclic (plunger technique) aspiration. Embolus analogs were used to create occlusions in a mock circulatory flow loop, and one aspiration attempt (first pass effect) using either a static or plunger technique was performed. The percent ingestion of each embolus analog was recorded for each trial.

RESULTS: Static aspiration for 0% and 50% hematocrit embolus analogs resulted in ingestions of 12.8 ± 4.6% and 15.1 ± 10.0%, respectively, while plunger technique (cyclic) aspiration resulted in 15.8 ± 7.3% and 34.4 ± 19.5% ingestion. Complete ingestion was observed only with 50% hematocrit analogs, occurring in 30% of plunger and 10% of static cases. Statistical differences were determined between the two aspiration techniques for the 50% hematocrit samples, with the plunger technique yielding significantly more ingestion. In addition, the plunger technique was shown to maintain a negative vacuum pressure throughout the duration of cyclic plunging.

CONCLUSIONS: The plunger technique for manual cyclic aspiration resulted in higher rates of complete ingestion and greater average % ingestions when compared to static aspiration. Increased clot ingestion can result in a higher rate of complete reperfusion during the first aspiration attempt, maximizing the number of patients with good clinical outcomes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app