Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Lipid-based nutrient supplements for prevention of child undernutrition: when less may be more.

BACKGROUND: Both small-quantity (SQ) and medium-quantity (MQ) lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) have been used for prevention of child undernutrition. A meta-analysis of 14 trials of SQ-LNS vs no LNS showed effects on length-for-age (LAZ, +0.14 (95% confidence interval 0.11, 0.16)) and weight-for-length (WLZ, +0.08 (0.06, 0.10)) z-scores, as well as prevalence ratios (95% CI) for stunting (LAZ<-2, 0.88 (0.85, 0.91)) and wasting (WLZ < -2, 0.86 (0.80, 0.93)). However, little is known about the effects of MQ-LNS on growth.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the effects of preventive MQ-LNS (∼250-499 kcal/d) provided at ∼6-23 mo of age on growth outcomes compared to no LNS or provision of SQ-LNS.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies of MQ-LNS for prevention, and categorized them as providing < 6 mo vs. > 6 mo of supplementation; for the latter category we conducted a meta-analysis, with main outcomes being change in WLZ and LAZ, and prevalence of wasting and stunting.

RESULTS: Three studies provided MQ-LNS for 3-5 mo (seasonal) for children 6-36 mo of age, and did not show consistent effects on growth outcomes. Eight studies provided MQ-LNS for 6-18 mo, generally starting at 6 mo of age; in the meta-analysis (max total n=13,954), MQ-LNS increased WLZ (+0.09 (95% confidence interval 0.05, 0.13)) and reduced wasting (0.89 (0.81, 0.97)), but had no effect on LAZ (+0.04 (-0.02, 0.11)) or stunting (0.97 (0.92, 1.02)) compared to no LNS. Two studies directly compared SQ-LNS and MQ-LNS and showed no significant differences in growth outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that MQ-LNS offers no added benefits over SQ-LNS, although further studies directly comparing MQ-LNS to SQ-LNS would be useful. One possible explanation is incomplete consumption of the MQ-LNS ration and thus lower than desirable intake of certain nutrients.

REGISTRY: PROSPERO CRD42022382448: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022382448 REGISTRY AND REGISTRY NUMBER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OR META-ANALYSES: Registered with PROSPERO as CRD42022382448 on December 18, 2022: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022382448.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app