We have located links that may give you full text access.
Impact of Antegrade Pulmonary Blood Flow as Patients Progress through Single Ventricle Palliations.
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2023 July 31
BACKGROUND: The impact of antegrade pulmonary blood flow (APBF) during single-ventricle (SV) palliation continues to be debated. We sought to assess its impact on the hemodynamic profile on the short- and long-term outcomes on patients progressing through stages of SV-palliation.
METHODS: Retrospective single-center study of SV-patients who underwent surgery between January/2010 and December/2020. Patients with APBF were matched to those with no-APBF using a propensity score based on BSA, sex, and type of systemic-ventricle. Analysis was performed using appropriate statistics with a significance level of p=0.05.
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with APBF were matched with 95 patients with no-APBF at the prestage-2 catheterization, APBF patients had a larger left pulmonary artery (PA) diameter (z-score 0.1 vs -0.8, p<0.042). Patients with APBF had shorter CPB-time (57.0 vs 79.0 minutes), shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (14.1 vs 17.4 hours), and shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (5.0 vs 7.0 days) at stage-2 palliation (p<0.05). In the multivariable cox regression analysis, patients with hypoplastic PAs (z-scores <-2) (aHR 9.17), and patients with chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndrome (aHR 4.03) were at increased risk for poor outcomes (p<0.05). Over the follow-up period, there was no significant difference in risk of the composite poor outcome, and long-term survival between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: SV-patients with APBF had shorter CPB-time, duration of MV, and hospital LOS after stage-2 palliation. Patients with hypoplastic PAs or chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes had increased risk for poor outcomes. Maintaining APBF has better short-term outcomes, but there are no long-term hemodynamic or survival benefits.
METHODS: Retrospective single-center study of SV-patients who underwent surgery between January/2010 and December/2020. Patients with APBF were matched to those with no-APBF using a propensity score based on BSA, sex, and type of systemic-ventricle. Analysis was performed using appropriate statistics with a significance level of p=0.05.
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with APBF were matched with 95 patients with no-APBF at the prestage-2 catheterization, APBF patients had a larger left pulmonary artery (PA) diameter (z-score 0.1 vs -0.8, p<0.042). Patients with APBF had shorter CPB-time (57.0 vs 79.0 minutes), shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (14.1 vs 17.4 hours), and shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (5.0 vs 7.0 days) at stage-2 palliation (p<0.05). In the multivariable cox regression analysis, patients with hypoplastic PAs (z-scores <-2) (aHR 9.17), and patients with chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndrome (aHR 4.03) were at increased risk for poor outcomes (p<0.05). Over the follow-up period, there was no significant difference in risk of the composite poor outcome, and long-term survival between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: SV-patients with APBF had shorter CPB-time, duration of MV, and hospital LOS after stage-2 palliation. Patients with hypoplastic PAs or chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes had increased risk for poor outcomes. Maintaining APBF has better short-term outcomes, but there are no long-term hemodynamic or survival benefits.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app