We have located links that may give you full text access.
Physiological Factors Associated with Unsatisfied Inspiration at Peak Exercise in Healthy Adults.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2024 March 29
INTRODUCTION: Contrary to common belief, a growing body of evidence suggests that unsatisfied inspiration (UI), an inherently uncomfortable quality of dyspnea, is experienced by ostensibly healthy adults during high-intensity exercise. Based on our understanding of the mechanisms of UI among people with chronic respiratory conditions, this analysis tested the hypothesis that the experience of UI at peak exercise in young, healthy adults reflects the combination of high ventilatory demand and critical inspiratory constraints.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis design, data included 321 healthy individuals (129 females) aged 25 ± 5 yrs. Data were collected during one visit to the laboratory, which included anthropometrics, spirometry, and an incremental cardiopulmonary cycling test to exhaustion. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory variables were measured at peak exercise, and qualitative descriptors of dyspnea at peak exercise were assessed using a list of 15 descriptor phrases.
RESULTS: 34% of participants (n = 109) reported sensations of UI at peak exercise. Compared to the Non-UI group, the UI group achieved a significantly higher peak work rate (243 ± 77 vs. 235 ± 69 W, P = 0.016, d = 0.10), rate of O2 consumption (3.32 ± 1.02 vs. 3.27 ± 0.96 L·min-1, P = 0.018, d = 0.05), minute ventilation (120 ± 38 vs. 116 ± 35 L·min-1, P = 0.047, d = 0.11), and breathing frequency (50 ± 9 vs. 47 ± 9 breaths·min-1, P = 0.014, d = 0.33), while having a lower exercise-induced change (peak-baseline) in inspiratory capacity (0.07 ± 0.41 vs. 0.20 ± 0.49 L, P = 0.023, d = 0.29). The inspiratory reserve volume to minute ventilation ratio at peak exercise was also lower in the UI vs. Non-UI group. Dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness ratings were significantly higher in the UI vs. Non-UI group at peak exercise (both P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Healthy individuals reporting UI at peak exercise have relatively greater inspiratory constraints compared to those who do not select UI.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis design, data included 321 healthy individuals (129 females) aged 25 ± 5 yrs. Data were collected during one visit to the laboratory, which included anthropometrics, spirometry, and an incremental cardiopulmonary cycling test to exhaustion. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory variables were measured at peak exercise, and qualitative descriptors of dyspnea at peak exercise were assessed using a list of 15 descriptor phrases.
RESULTS: 34% of participants (n = 109) reported sensations of UI at peak exercise. Compared to the Non-UI group, the UI group achieved a significantly higher peak work rate (243 ± 77 vs. 235 ± 69 W, P = 0.016, d = 0.10), rate of O2 consumption (3.32 ± 1.02 vs. 3.27 ± 0.96 L·min-1, P = 0.018, d = 0.05), minute ventilation (120 ± 38 vs. 116 ± 35 L·min-1, P = 0.047, d = 0.11), and breathing frequency (50 ± 9 vs. 47 ± 9 breaths·min-1, P = 0.014, d = 0.33), while having a lower exercise-induced change (peak-baseline) in inspiratory capacity (0.07 ± 0.41 vs. 0.20 ± 0.49 L, P = 0.023, d = 0.29). The inspiratory reserve volume to minute ventilation ratio at peak exercise was also lower in the UI vs. Non-UI group. Dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness ratings were significantly higher in the UI vs. Non-UI group at peak exercise (both P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Healthy individuals reporting UI at peak exercise have relatively greater inspiratory constraints compared to those who do not select UI.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app