We have located links that may give you full text access.
Practices and knowledge of general practitioners on erectile dysfunction: A practice survey.
Fr J Urol 2024 Februrary 27
INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common and underestimated sexual disorder. This sexual concern, which should raise the suspicion of an underlying coronary artery disease, is rarely broached by general practitioners (GPs). The aim of this work was to establish an inventory of the practices and knowledge of general practitioners when faced with a case of ED.
METHODS: This survey is a descriptive cross-sectional epidemiological study targeting GPs' practice. Answers were collected through a self-questionnaire, "KIKI SAIT?", online that explored: demographic data, level of practice and theoretical knowledge regarding ED.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven GPs took part in this study. Regarding their practice, 80.2% of doctors expected the patient to bring up the subject. Few clinicians managed ED according to recommendations of the French Association of Urology. More than 30% referred the patient to a urologist, cardiologist or endocrinologist. In total, 57.6% of practitioners prescribed a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) as first-line treatment. Regarding their knowledge, 67.8% of doctors considered their level of knowledge about PDE5I to be poor, 96.6% about intracavernosal injections, 88.7% about vacuum devices and 91% about penis rings. The main obstacle retained was the lack of medical knowledge (71.2%). Clinicians who rarely consulted for ED were less confident in explaining possible treatments (25/63 versus 18/113, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Strengthening initial training and providing a practical algorithm for the management of ED could be useful to help general practitioners detect ED, which could be a sentinel of coronary heart disease.
METHODS: This survey is a descriptive cross-sectional epidemiological study targeting GPs' practice. Answers were collected through a self-questionnaire, "KIKI SAIT?", online that explored: demographic data, level of practice and theoretical knowledge regarding ED.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven GPs took part in this study. Regarding their practice, 80.2% of doctors expected the patient to bring up the subject. Few clinicians managed ED according to recommendations of the French Association of Urology. More than 30% referred the patient to a urologist, cardiologist or endocrinologist. In total, 57.6% of practitioners prescribed a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) as first-line treatment. Regarding their knowledge, 67.8% of doctors considered their level of knowledge about PDE5I to be poor, 96.6% about intracavernosal injections, 88.7% about vacuum devices and 91% about penis rings. The main obstacle retained was the lack of medical knowledge (71.2%). Clinicians who rarely consulted for ED were less confident in explaining possible treatments (25/63 versus 18/113, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Strengthening initial training and providing a practical algorithm for the management of ED could be useful to help general practitioners detect ED, which could be a sentinel of coronary heart disease.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app