We have located links that may give you full text access.
Increased risk of placenta previa and preterm birth in pregnant women with endometriosis/adenomyosis: A propensity-score matching analysis of a nationwide perinatal database in Japan.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2023 December 11
AIM: We aimed to investigate the associations of endometriosis and adenomyosis with pregnancy complications by using a large-scale Japanese database.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 145 590 singleton pregnancies from the Japan Perinatal Registry Network Database. Pregnant women registered as having endometriosis or adenomyosis were designated as the case group (EA), whereas the control group (non-EA) was selected using propensity-score matching adjusted for variables such as age, parity, BMI, smoking history, and the use of assisted reproductive technology. The main outcomes included placental malposition, preterm birth, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP).
RESULTS: In total, 1203 patients from both the EA and non-EA groups were matched and evaluated. The EA group showed significantly higher rates of placenta previa (odds ratio [OR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-4.92), low-lying placenta (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.06-3.86), and preterm birth (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.13-1.84) than the non-EA group. However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of HDP (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.90-1.66).
CONCLUSION: The use of propensity-score matching to analyze a nationwide perinatal database in Japan clarified that EA was associated with increased pregnancy complications, specifically placental malposition, including placenta previa and low-lying placenta, and preterm birth, but not with HDP.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 145 590 singleton pregnancies from the Japan Perinatal Registry Network Database. Pregnant women registered as having endometriosis or adenomyosis were designated as the case group (EA), whereas the control group (non-EA) was selected using propensity-score matching adjusted for variables such as age, parity, BMI, smoking history, and the use of assisted reproductive technology. The main outcomes included placental malposition, preterm birth, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP).
RESULTS: In total, 1203 patients from both the EA and non-EA groups were matched and evaluated. The EA group showed significantly higher rates of placenta previa (odds ratio [OR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-4.92), low-lying placenta (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.06-3.86), and preterm birth (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.13-1.84) than the non-EA group. However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of HDP (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.90-1.66).
CONCLUSION: The use of propensity-score matching to analyze a nationwide perinatal database in Japan clarified that EA was associated with increased pregnancy complications, specifically placental malposition, including placenta previa and low-lying placenta, and preterm birth, but not with HDP.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis.Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2024 March 26
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app