Comparative study of internal device vs. external device in Le Fort III distraction for syndromic craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Le Fort III distraction for syndromic craniosynostosis is performed using internal or external devices. We compared the results of both devices.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 60 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated with Le Fort III distraction (internal or external device) between 2001 and 2021. We verified demographic data, surgery-related data, and complications using medical records. For each of the two devices, we compared the various factors associated with the device to each other.

RESULTS: External deviceThirty-two patients with syndromic craniosynostosis were included. The mean age at surgery was 11.7 years, and the mean elongation length was 20.0mm. Class-III occlusion reoccurred in 11 patients and was significantly associated with age at surgery. Seven complications (device problems and others) were noted. Cranial pin slippage was significantly related to the elongation length.Internal deviceTwenty-eight patients with syndromic craniosynostosis were included. The mean age at surgery was 10.4 years, and the mean elongation length was 18.7mm. There were 15 complications, including device problems, zygomatic-maxillary fractures, and infections. Elongation length was significantly related to these complications. Class-III occlusion reoccurred in nine patients and was significantly related to age at surgery.

CONCLUSION: This study found that complications are significantly more likely to occur in internal devices than in external devices, especially device infection. Our findings identified several factors that may assist surgeons in selecting between external and internal devices. The relationship between the amount of extension and device-related problems found in this study will be beneficial for solving these problems.