[Research on the surgery treatment and etiology of fungal endophthalmitis].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of vitrectomy and etiological diagnosis in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis. Methods: A retrospective survey was done on the clinical manifestation, etiological diagnosis and treatment efficacy of 15 patients (15 eyes) who had been diagnosed with fungal endophthalmitis at the inpatient department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital during 2002-2015. A total of 15 eyes of 15 patients, 3 male and 12 female patients, were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was (45.8±15.3) years. Among the 15 eyes, 12 (12 patients) were diagnosed with endogenous fungal endophthalmitis and 3 (3 patients) were diagnosed with exogenous fungal endophthalmitis. Fourteen eyes have been misdiagnosed with uveitis, systematic or local application of glucocorticoid and/or immunosuppressor have been conducted on the patients which resulted in exacerbation. Baseline visual acuity: light perception in 2 eyes, hand movement for 12 eyes, and 1 eye of 0.1. Six eyes showed slight inflammatory reaction in anterior chamber, four eyes showed moderate inflammatory reaction in anterior chamber, while five eyes showed severe inflammatory reaction with hypopyon in anterior chamber. B-Scan ultrasound examination showed inflammatory vitreous opacity in all 15 eyes, combined proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) were found in 11 eyes, retinal detachment were found in 10 eyes, which include 6 cases of tractional retinal detachment, 1 case of exudative retinal detachment, and 3 cases of retinal and choroid detachment. Forty eyes underwent vitrectomy, 1 eye underwent intravitreal injection. Nine eyes were processed with silicone oil tamponade, one eye was processed with C(3)F(8) tamponade. At the beginning of the operation, vitreous fluids were collected for preparing smears which were later used for fungus culture and drug susceptibility testing. Results: According to the smear results of vitreous fluid, fungal hyphae and spores were found in 10 eyes. The fungus culture indicated positive results in 12 eyes, including candida albicans in 6 eyes, fusarium, candida parapsilosis, paecilomyces lilacinus, asoergullus terreus, mulan candida and aspergillus in 1 eye respectively. Based on etiological diagnosis, 14 eyes received amphotericin B intraocular injection during operation, and 9 patients received fluconazole (venous transfusion or oral administration), 2 patients received voriconazole through venous transfusion or oral administration, one patient received itraconazole through oral administration. All 15 eyes received local application of amphotericin B eyedrop or fluconazole eyedrop. The intraocular inflammations in all 15 eyes were mitigated. The visual acuity improved in 6 eyes, remained unchanged in 4 eyes, and reduced in 5 eyes. Postoperative visual acuity achieved 0.1 to 0.15 in 2 eyes, 0.01 to 0.04 in 2 eyes, CF in 2 eyes, HM in 4 eyes, LP in 2 eyes, and NLP in 3 eyes. The retina of 5 eyes remained in position, the retina of 2 eyes reattached, the retina of 2 eyes failed to reattach. Recurrent retinal detachment happened in the other 6 eyes, 5 of which received reoperation. Eventually, the retina of 10 eyes reattached, and the retina of the 5 eyes failed to reattach. Conclusions: Vitrectomy is an effective method for treatment of fungal endophthalmitis. The positive rates of vitreous smear and fungus culture were really high. Application of sensitive anti-fungal drugs based on etiological diagnose can improve therapeutic level. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2018, 54: 270-276) .