English Abstract
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Time Course of Changes in Visual Acuity After a Single Injection of Aflibercept or Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration - Analysis of Aggregated Real Life Data].

Background Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) under real life conditions may differ from controlled prospective trials with respect to the number of injections and long term preservation of visual acuity. In many instances, intervals for controls and re-injection cannot be maintained as frequently as required. This case series examines actual intervals for control and re-injection visits, in order to estimate how prolonged intervals have an impact on momentary visual acuity and how long term visual outcome is affected. Patients/Material and Methods Retrospective case series of 1,324 eyes with nvAMD, treated with a total of 8,150 ranibizumab injections (according to the PRN regimen) or 1,725 aflibercept injections (according to a fixed regimen), during the observation period of up to 3 years. The evaluation covered the time interval between visits, impact of this on the course of visual acuity, as well as the number of injections throughout treatment. Results Planned intervals of 4 or 8 weeks between visits were more often exceeded in the PRN regimen than with the fixed regimen. Visual acuity does not peak after 4 weeks, but only between 6 and 8 weeks. No statistically significant difference between aflibercept and ranibizumab was found. If the mean interval for re-injection was maintained at 4 - 6 weeks, this gave the greatest gains in visual acuity at end of years 1 and 2, respectively. Any prolongation of these intervals was accompanied by worse long term visual acuity. The fixed regimen is associated with consistently briefer re-treatment intervals during years 2 and 3, than with the PRN regimen. Conclusion Our data point to the importance of frequent controls accompanied by timely retreatment, as these have a major impact on visual outcome. It therefore appears to be more important to choose a treatment plan that facilitates frequent re-injections than to select either of the two compounds.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app