We have located links that may give you full text access.
Genomic Triangulation and Coverage Analysis in Whole-Exome Sequencing-Based Molecular Autopsies.
Circulation. Cardiovascular Genetics 2017 October
BACKGROUND: WEMA (Whole-Exome Molecular Autopsy) and surveillance of cardiac channelopathy and cardiomyopathy genes represents the latest molecular autopsy for sudden death in the young (SDY). To date, the majority of WEMA has been performed on the SDY case only.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed whole-exome sequencing and nucleotide-level coverage analysis on 28 SDY cases (18.4±7.8 years) and their parents to determine the inheritance patterns of ultrarare, nonsynonymous variants in 99 sudden death-susceptibility genes. Nonsynonymous variants were adjudicated using the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. Overall, 17 sudden death-susceptibility gene variants were identified in 12 of 28 (43%) SDY cases. On the basis of the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines, 6 of 28 (21%) cases had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic nonsynonymous variant with 3 (50%) being de novo. Two nonsynonymous variants would not have been elevated to likely pathogenic status without knowing their de novo status. Whole-exome sequencing reached a read depth of 10× across 90% of nucleotides within sudden death-susceptibility genes in 100% of parental exomes from fresh blood draw, compared with only 82% of autopsy-sourced SDY exomes.
CONCLUSIONS: An SDY-parent, trio-based WEMA may be an effective way of elucidating a monogenic cause of death and bringing clarity to otherwise ambiguous variants. If other studies confirm this relatively high rate of SDY cases stemming from de novo mutations, then the WEMA should become even more cost-effective given that the decedent's first-degree relatives should only need minimal cardiological evaluation. In addition, autopsy-sourced DNA demonstrated strikingly lower whole-exome sequencing coverage than DNA from fresh blood draw.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed whole-exome sequencing and nucleotide-level coverage analysis on 28 SDY cases (18.4±7.8 years) and their parents to determine the inheritance patterns of ultrarare, nonsynonymous variants in 99 sudden death-susceptibility genes. Nonsynonymous variants were adjudicated using the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. Overall, 17 sudden death-susceptibility gene variants were identified in 12 of 28 (43%) SDY cases. On the basis of the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines, 6 of 28 (21%) cases had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic nonsynonymous variant with 3 (50%) being de novo. Two nonsynonymous variants would not have been elevated to likely pathogenic status without knowing their de novo status. Whole-exome sequencing reached a read depth of 10× across 90% of nucleotides within sudden death-susceptibility genes in 100% of parental exomes from fresh blood draw, compared with only 82% of autopsy-sourced SDY exomes.
CONCLUSIONS: An SDY-parent, trio-based WEMA may be an effective way of elucidating a monogenic cause of death and bringing clarity to otherwise ambiguous variants. If other studies confirm this relatively high rate of SDY cases stemming from de novo mutations, then the WEMA should become even more cost-effective given that the decedent's first-degree relatives should only need minimal cardiological evaluation. In addition, autopsy-sourced DNA demonstrated strikingly lower whole-exome sequencing coverage than DNA from fresh blood draw.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Status epilepticus: what's new for the intensivist.Current Opinion in Critical Care 2024 Februrary 15
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app