English Abstract
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[RUSSIAN NATIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY "RUVENT": THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL LUNG VENTILATION IN THE INTENSIVE THERAPY IN CHILDREN].

UNLABELLED: Purpose of this part of the "RuVent" research is to study the real use of the various modes and parameters of prolonged respiratory support in children in Russia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 104 children from 29 ICUs (28 in Russian Federation, 1 in Ukraine) under the age of 15 years with ALV duration more than 12 hours in the period from February 7 to 11, 2011. The collection of information performed through online forms.

RESULTS: Total lethality was 20.7% (18 of 87 patients). The main reasons for prolonged respiratory support in children were the pathology of the respiratory system: acute respiratory distress syndrome (21.2%), community-acquired pneumonia (9.5%), sepsis (8.2%), and congenital disorders of the central nervous system (8.2%) and cardiac arrest (8.2%). According to the study "RuVent" doctors mostly prefer managed modes of respiratory support (SIMV 41.3%, A/C 28.8%, BIPAP 12.5%). Frequency of non-invasive respiratory support use amounted to 1%. Real respiratory volume based on ideal body weight calculation, averaged for boys 9.2 (7.3; 11.2) ml/kg (n = 54), for girls--8.7 (7.1; 10.1) m/kg (n = 38). PEEP median amounted to 4 mbar Tracheostomy was performed in 12 children out of 104 (11.5%), predominantly classic (n = 11), puncture dilated tracheostomy was performed in 1 child. The median of the tracheostomy installation in children was 24.5 days. The duration of respiratory support in children was 11 days (5; 25) (n = 43). The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in children was 27.9% (12 of 43 cases).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of the Russian national epidemiological study of the use of mechanical ventilation in the Intensive care unit ("RuVent") showed comparable data with real international clinical practice. The researchers noted significant differences during prolonged mechanical ventilation in children compared with adult patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app